Could daylight revive ourParade?

www.samesame.com.au

About the Author

www.samesame.com.au

Michael Turtle

  • 39
  • 6
  • 3177

Aussie traveler Michael Turtle was in San Diego during the city’s colourful Pride festivities at the weekend. He now reports back, telling Same Same: “The March I went to watch certainly wasn’t perfect, but it was really interesting to compare it to Mardi Gras. It had such a cool and relaxed community vibe.”

So could San Diego’s Parade teach Sydney a thing or two? Read Michael’s assessment below…


There’s a point every year during Sydney’s Mardi Gras parade that you have to remind yourself what it’s all about.

The message the parade is trying to send can seem as confused as the spectators who spend more time staring at the oiled-up dancers than their trophy girlfriends. Amongst the sequins, the feathers, and the leather, it’s easy to forget the origin of the event. In some ways, Sydney’s parade has become a PDA – a public display of affectation.

So it was refreshing to see the Pride March in San Diego on the weekend. It was an event for the gay community, embraced by the whole community. It was not a spectator event where the locals came to the street to gawk at the participants – the spectators were as much a part of the action as those on the street. This was a true expression of support, of solidarity and of pride.

There’s no doubt that Sydney’s Mardi Gras is a huge event that brings tourists to the city, provides a focus for the queer community and provides a platform for social issues to be raised. But, compared to something like the San Diego Pride (or many other Pride events around the world), it’s not clear that it achieves its aim.

So, here are some things to consider… things that Sydney could learn from other parades around the world:

DAYLIGHT

If you hide in the shadows of night, you lurk in the dark part of people’s minds. And so, by holding the Pride marches in the middle of the day, the participants are showing they have nothing to hide. The queer scene is too often associated with darkness, with night, with the things that happen in the dark of night. Starting the parade at 11 in the morning brings the cause out into the open and helps illuminate the issues.

ALCOHOL

Although this probably has more to do with the time of day than anything else, it is interesting the alteration of mood that a sober crowd can bring to a march. Much like the dark, alcohol is often associated with the queer crowd. By removing it from the event (voluntarily, keep in mind), it shows another side to the culture. It’s not needed to enjoy the event. In fact, the event becomes more enjoyable because it is not tainted by the vulgarities of excess. It lends itself to a friendly and family feel.

FAMILY

Quite astonishing to a foreign observer was the number of children and families at the Pride March in San Diego. You wouldn’t normally think it’s the kind of event to take your children along to, but there they were by the SUV-fill (that’s an American reference). And they were getting extremely involved in the celebration – waving flags, blowing soap bubbles, playing instruments. As the marchers walked down the street, they handed the children toys and stickers and candy. Whether the youngsters actually understand what it’s all about, who knows? But one day when they do have to make a decision about how they’ll treat someone, they’ll remember the welcoming atmosphere… not the loud music and leather of Sydney.

FLOATS

Speaking of outrageous costumes, San Diego didn’t have too many. Don’t get me wrong, there were a few outlandish outfits and they were well-received by the crowds. But the floats weren’t all about flashy choreography, blaring music and eye-catching costumes. Unlike Sydney, this was focused much more on the message behind the float… there were serving members of the military, politicians who had fought for important legislative changes, or actors who played a mother on an iconic television show and then turned out to be gay (OK, there was just one of them in the parade, but Meredith Baxter from Family Ties is cool enough to seem like an entire float!).

Once the San Diego parade finished, there’s no doubt that the parties began. As we all know, gays will be gays. The city probably doesn’t expect anything else, anyway. But the city did get a chance to be a part of the action and you felt like it appreciated that. There was not that Sydney feeling that the queer community is putting on a show for the crowds to come along and gawk at. In this case the feeling was that the crowds came because they wanted to support and they wanted to show that they shared the same emotion as everyone involved… pride.


Check out Michael Turtle’s Time Travel Turtle blog here.

Social

  • delabourgeoise
  • genkij
  • Steven6p
  • christianbaines82
  • Travis de Jonk
  • brodes13

Comments

www.samesame.com.au arrow left
24024
lordpats

lordpats said on the 21st Jul, 2011

A rally in the day would simply not have the impact or be the experience a night parade is. A certain amount of edginess and naughtiness allows the parade to be a potent way to confront heterosexual dominance over love and sex. If we feel we have to conform to their flawed values, then we lose the respect we have gained as challengers of oppressive, discriminative values and the status quo by simply cowering and suppressing a necessary message. But above all, why do we feel the need to force some members of the community to not express their sexuality on one night of the year, but give heterosexuals a free reign to express their sexuality as freely as they want on any particular day? Most of the night parade is tame, and none of the parade is worse than that seen among heterosexual expressions of sexuality. By getting rid of it or making it a quiet rally, we would be getting rid of an event valued by many in the international gay community and rubbishing a true standout product of Sydney nightlife. Why should we destroy a unique event which gives so much to the character of and unique identity of Sydney? Remember, this is the one day of the year where our sexuality is emphasized. A day parade, as seen in Melbourne and San Diego would be bland, designed for middle class conservative gays, and be unappealing to youth. It would represent nothing more than a polite submission to the most conservative heterosexual values and the most virulent, extreme homophobes who want to undermine and destroy our parade.

lordpats

lordpats said on the 25th Jul, 2011

The fight for equality isn't going to be won with a public spectacle for exhbitionists and reinforce negative stereotypes, which it does.

I don't think the majority of parade goers would appreciate being labeled "exhibitionists" who "reinforce negative stereotypes". The vast majority of parade goers are mainstream gay people who often attend with their heterosexual relatives and friends. As a government supported, commercially backed event, Mardi Gras has lost whatever edge may have influenced it, and is now recognised by much of the wider community as a normal annual event.

"By having a day time parade and after festival event like what is held in the Melbourne Midsumma shows the inclusion of a broad diverse and mature community. "

This is disingenuous. You claim that a day parade shows "the inclusion of a broad and diverse and mature community", yet you want to censor a small part of our community who embrace exhibitionism at the parade. Just because you don't like the way one minute section of the community expresses itself doesn't mean they should be excluded from a parade that is meant to be a 'diverse' and 'inclusive' representation of the 'broad' community. The fact that it receives government, commercial and public support suggests both our community and the wider community recognise it as a positive representation of a"'broad diverse and mature community. "

But what I really can't stand is that every day is a celebration of heterosexual sexuality, and while they are free to express the full spectrum of their sexuality, the evening dedicated to our sexuality is subject to censorship so as not to "reinforce negative stereotypes". However, these negative stereotypes are based on homophobic assumptions which fly in the face of the simple fact that most gay people are like everybody else. It is not our job to tell the straight community the bleeding obvious that most in our community are not like a minute few. Nobody says all heterosexual people enjoy outdoor swinger parties, and while we need to confront the illegitimacy of these assumptions, it is the responsibility of heterosexuals who hold them to confront the homophobic basis of these assumptions and repudiate them. If we start censoring ourselves, we pander and provide legitimacy to homophobic misrepresentations of our community.

MrAsh

MrAsh said on the 25th Jul, 2011

The fight for equality isn't going to be won with a public spectacle for exhbitionists and reinforce negative stereotypes, which it does.

I don't think the majority of parade goers would appreciate being labeled "exhibitionists" who "reinforce negative stereotypes". The vast majority of parade goers are mainstream gay people who often attend with their heterosexual relatives and friends. As a government supported, commercially backed event, Mardi Gras has lost whatever edge may have influenced it, and is now recognised by much of the wider community as a normal annual event.

"By having a day time parade and after festival event like what is held in the Melbourne Midsumma shows the inclusion of a broad diverse and mature community. "

This is disingenuous. You claim that a day parade shows "the inclusion of a broad and diverse and mature community", yet you want to censor a small part of our community who embrace exhibitionism at the parade. Just because you don't like the way one minute section of the community expresses itself doesn't mean they should be excluded from a parade that is meant to be a 'diverse' and 'inclusive' representation of the 'broad' community. The fact that it receives government, commercial and public support suggests both our community and the wider community recognise it as a positive representation of a"'broad diverse and mature community. "

But what I really can't stand is that every day is a celebration of heterosexual sexuality, and while they are free to express the full spectrum of their sexuality, the evening dedicated to our sexuality is subject to censorship so as not to "reinforce negative stereotypes". However, these negative stereotypes are based on homophobic assumptions which fly in the face of the simple fact that most gay people are like everybody else. It is not our job to tell the straight community the bleeding obvious that most in our community are not like a minute few. Nobody says all heterosexual people enjoy outdoor swinger parties, and while we need to confront the illegitimacy of these assumptions, it is the responsibility of heterosexuals who hold them to confront the homophobic basis of these assumptions and repudiate them. If we start censoring ourselves, we pander and provide legitimacy to homophobic misrepresentations of our community.

The day time parade can have many diffferent elements to it and the fetish and sexually expressive GLTBI folk can have a separate event, like Folsom street. It's a real shame that the Forbes Street Leather event stopped years ago. Baracade and put a fence up and let the leather and fetish crowd have a party of their lives there one day a year.

As for the censorship, once you get commercial sponsors and government involved there is bound to be censorship regardless of what you may believe, they have and image and brand to protect.

lordpats

lordpats said on the 25th Jul, 2011

There is already commercial sponsorship and government support for MG, and any existing censorship of Mardi Gras does not prohibit the small number of exhibitionists you want to exclude from marching. If they are OK with everybody being included, on whose behalf are we censoring ourselves, if not the homophobic assumptions heterosexuals base their 'negative stereotypes?'

The Folsom Street Fair is not an alternative event. It is actually larger than Mardi Gras, with an attendance of over 400000. It is another event to supplement the San Francisco Pride, and designed to celebrate the leather community. The leather community, or other exhibitionist queers, are free to and encouraged to march in the San Francisco pride as well. Ironically, both are outdoor events, and both are edgier than our Mardi Gras. If San Francisco can cope, why can't we? The San Franciscans would never change an event which they developed and made unique to some overseas cliche. Why are some members of our community so lacking in pride for our own unique parade?

I don't see why Sydney should purposefully exclude members of our community simply because other members don't like them. We need to become more united, accepting, inclusive. We mustn't isolate a stigmatised group within an already marginalised community by segregating them and by the same token symbolically rejecting them as a part of the community for expressing their sexuality. You say that you want diversity, but you can't accept diversity of expression. What is so wrong with a minute number of people participating in a parade who are more sexually expressionistic than you?

How exactly do you suggest we force exhibitionists from the parade anyway? By making Mardi Gras a day event we forgo a perfectly diverse, well attended, unique event in Sydney, in favour of a bland march intended to exclude people. It panders to the homophobes like Fred Nile by accepting their homophobic "negative stereotypes" rather than confronting the validity of them, despite the fact numerous commercial sponsors and Government support are happy to accept the Mardi Gras as is.