When did straight-actingbecome attractive?

www.samesame.com.au
  • 145
  • 20
  • 8380

Are people who assure you they are straight acting just subtly fostering homophobia? After all, there’s nothing wrong with being gay acting, writes Alexander Leighton.


Looking back on the concept of straight-acting, I first have to recall an artwork I saw in a gallery when I was about 12. I must have stood there staring at it for a good fifteen minutes before my Mum came over and thought that my curiosity meant that she had to explain what gay was to me. In reality, I knew what gay meant but I didn’t know what straight meant. Once I knew what straight meant, I couldn’t understand why the out gay men who were my idols at the time, would want to act like a straight man – which to my understanding and the understanding of the artist meant that they adhered to straight stereotypes and avoided gay ones so as to appear heterosexual.

So now, six years later I am still faced with the question “Why would out gay men want to act like straight men?” Isn’t the whole concept of straight acting a massive example of internalised homophobia? I mean if you say “I act straight” aren’t you buying into the idea that there is some definitive way in that being a homosexual changes the way that you act? And what does it even mean to act straight? From a cursory look at the website straightacting.com straight acting is advertised as acting in a masculine manner. If one can assume that in a man, straight is synonymous with masculine, then does this mean that gay is synonymous with effeminate? Isn’t this one of the main ideas from which homophobia springs; that all gay men are effeminate and all straight men are masculine?

Yet something I’ve heard so many times from particularly masculine men who have been attracted to me is “One of the things I like about you is that you aren’t super gay, you know, you don’t act like a girl all the time.” I think when I get told that, the guys expect it to come across as some super-meaningful compliment so when I reply “Well, if you don’t want someone gay then you’ve got the wrong person,” they tend to get confused.

It’s at this point that I need to clarify that I’m not writing this article to criticise masculine homosexual men. I’m criticising the homosexual men who think that straight acting makes them somehow socially superior and go out of their way to appear straight to anyone who they don’t want to have gay sex with. If a homosexual man is masculine then that is how he is and I can say that I am a masculine homosexual man (mostly). If he says he is straight acting then that is not how he is, that is an act. Acting means to act, fancy that!

As far as I see it, if you want to act straight and pretend to be straight when you aren’t then why not go all the way and BE STRAIGHT. I certainly won’t miss you. Straight acting is something we’ve all done at one time or another for usually one reason: We don’t want people to know we are gay. So why are there now all these openly homosexual men saying they’re straight acting and more importantly WHY DO PEOPLE WANT STRAIGHT ACTING BOYFRIENDS?

As an example, I was on a date with a guy and he pulled me into a David Jones. I wasn’t really sure what was going on (as I definitely don’t call clothes shopping a date) until he pointed out a man with dyed pink hair with leopard spots shaved into it and started giggling. I had no idea what he was laughing about until he said “He’s so faggy; it’s hilarious.” Needless to say I was angry at him. Here he was, on a date with another man, and he was pointing out and ridiculing a random stranger for having a haircut that might be perceived as stereotypically gay. After listening to him call himself straight-acting for an entire evening and then being openly homophobic, I just left without another word.

Straight acting isn’t being masculine, it’s being homophobic. You are scared of being associated with homosexuals because of the adversity we face but you’re more than happy to take all the liberties our struggles against this adversity have brought you. I came out of the closet at age 14 as a gay-acting gay and I will always be gay-acting because I am gay. Every action I do is gay because I am gay.

So if you do just use the term ‘straight acting’ why not pause and think about the homophobia the term implies and just say ‘masculine’?

And if you’re acting straight purely because you think that it makes you better than all of us faggots, poofs and queers then I think that maybe you should finally step out of the closet and into our world because You can’t act straight and be gay. It’s an oxymoron, moron.

Social

  • Nickojj
  • Lulu
  • munchcrunch71
  • easonc
  • Mac31
  • Fezz
  • cute_n_cuddly
  • desmelbourne
  • megawatts
  • braveduck
  • mickel_23
  • Travis de Jonk
  • mikrosby
  • John Todd
  • Husky-D
  • someoneinatree
  • meezon04
  • Deek
  • Thom_l
  • Matt Akersten

Comments

www.samesame.com.au arrow left
27260
Shadow Rider

Shadow Rider said on the 22nd Mar, 2012

Why thank you for denigrating the entire female of the species again by saying that effeminate is weak and that being effiminate is wrong.
Every comment is evidence that all you "Gays"are misyoginistic. In some way or another. Why do you never see the Lesbians advertise as strait acting?
By saying your "Strait acting " are you trying to avoid the question of "so who is the woman in the relationship"
We are who we are. How many of us accept the individual but hate the community?
Where ever the human sees diference to themselves and their own familiarity they fear it first then hate it if they can understand it. Human nature being what it is , will we ever truly gain acceptance not just tolerance from all other communities? No! As we know internally that we are inherently different to those that are strait as mainstream society force feeds modern society stereotype after stereotype that strait is the only way and the only right way. Being different from strait makes you an outcast. It does not matter how you difer,you will not be accepted.
So until the world is made up of white hetrosexual males , anything that differs from that is somehow inferior.
Ask yourself these questions.
Who am I?
Identify yourself?
What makes you who you are?
So as we are all in this together and what ever label you give yourself to identify yourself or whatever label society gives you . You are a human being first. Are we not all equal? You are not a label ,you are an individual and everyone will answer those questions differently.
So as a Human being, that works hard, plays hard, and wants equality for all.
I am me. Look beyond the stereotype, you may meet a human being behind the wall of stereotype, that surprises you with their range of diversity.

someoneinatree

someoneinatree said on the 23rd Mar, 2012

Interesting to see that the ones that have the main problem with the term 'straight-acting' are generally the ones who seem for the most part, not 'straight-acting'


I don't think this is true necessarily. And again we're seeing another false "us vs them" divide being constructed. What you're seeing is people who use the term vs. people who don't use the term - clearly the ones who use it are going to defend it, and are also likely to identify as quite masculine. That doesn't logically equate to masculine gay guys are fine with it and feminine gay guys are not. It just highlights that people who already use it are going to be defensive about its usage. I'd like to emphasise that I identify as neither masculine or feminine as I think they're pretty inadequate categories to describe complex personalities.

What I find most surprising is that people seem to be taking it as an attack on guys who identify as masculine. It's certainly not in my case. I'm against guys using the language of "straight-acting", I'm not against the identity of the guys who use that language (except if they put down other people's identities in the process of asserting their own).

I find it even more troubling that there is an essentialist/heteronormative viewpoint on sex and gender, and occasionally extending to sexuality, underpinning quite a few of the responses (on both sides of the debate). Any viewpoint that attempts to define what a "real man" is or isn't, or that that uses language like "if I wanted to date a woman I'd be straight" I find pretty regressive.

Haven't we moved on? People are people, and they should be respected as such, and I personally think we should do our best to show that respect through the way we communicate.

When all is said and done, these kinds of arguments make me think of this amazing song:

[URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aj9yd-LdLCM"]Real Men - Joe Jackson

Dateon107

Dateon107 said on the 26th Mar, 2012

yeah this is in insanely grey issue with no real clear cut right or wrong that has been a integral part of my gay life so far and coming out, and it brings up heaps of points.

Whats frustrating is its a two way street but theres a double standard - I agree with the point made that its wrong to 'hide' behind a straight 'act' because you havent accepted your sexuality or thinking being effeminate in any form whether your mr flaming out and proud or just have the odd 'girly moment' is wrong or putting them down;

but its the way SOME of the ultra queens, bears and 'queers' take this sortof ownership over all things gay and act superior to guys that couldnt care about the scene either way or do go clubbing and have femme mates but dont feel as if they have to be flamboyant or sexuality defined. Yes, fighting to be themselves has done a hell of a lot for gay rights and all but mainly for THEIR section of gay society being more accepted, if that makes any sense. our section feels as if its still invisible under all the rainbow flag waving.

The more masculine/non-scene /'I dont do labels, I've got both masculine and feminine traits, im just me' guys shouldnt have to cop the 'you should be grateful for all we've done so YOU can be yourself' rhetoric some of them try to hold over our heads, fuck off, theres more than one section of gay life and it feels sometimes as if were not 'gay enough' and suddenly homophobic for stating were not into the scene or the stereotype that is the most visible to greater society cause it just overshadows us non-scene/more masc guys (which also could be a misnomer cause they might not be one and the same - you could have a fem guy who hates clubbing and loves sports for example, some people just dont fit into labels).

People are always gonna disagree on this, but I think the point i'm trying to make is sometimes it feels like the guys who arent all gay rights/scene/out and proud get attacked because the only easy visible way of showing theyre different from the 'usual' gay stereotype is trying to label themselves by what theyre not, but to the scene that comes off to some as self-hatred or homophobia or even attacking the big 'gay history and fight for rights' and the scene and just runs into crap that was never intended in the first place, and it really becomes an 'us vs them' thing when its not that that at all, were different, but its perfectly ok for the scene to express itself but we cant without being labelled homophobic to our own community as a whole, like they own everything that is gay.

as for finding more masculine guys desirable to date, I certainly do and the whole 'no fem guys' thing on grindr and such is another can of worms, but I think for someone looking for relationship or hookup material only... stating just what your after to the point on those things is near impossible for anything else but to put it quite blunt, I believe sexual selection and what people find attractive/not attractive are inherently discriminatory things by nature, and theres no way around not offending someone or other when it comes down to it - some people are just too precious and the idea that everyone dosent find the same things attractive and particularly them to be unfathomable. anyways.. tangent.

If anyone understands what im trying to say, champion cause like I said - complex issue with so many threads.. (look how much I ended up writing!)

Dateon107

Dateon107 said on the 27th Mar, 2012



true, but it is related and was only in the last paragraph of my argument anyway - bulk of it was the way that some who self identify as 'straight acting' be it cause they use the term as a thing to hide behind or feel superior or they use it to mean non-scene or masculine without finding a better term to use just to appease the ones that get all up in arms and offended by it;

the latter are the ones who get hit with the double standard unfortunately because to some of the femme, ultra stereotype bears and such and scene guys who 'made gay gay' and fought for our rights and all the rest of it, these poor guys who dont feel that represents who they are as a gay person feel like they cant speak out about whatever mix of traits they are which DONT fit an obvious stereotype without being branded homohobic or trying to put on an act to mask who they really are because surprise!, were not all the same flaming brand of homos. were people. funny that. :rolleyes:

a lot of people just miss the point completely and jump to the defensive when for the most part, theres no attack. its just guys not wanting to be pigionholed because theyre not OTT, not because they hate the OTT Scene, and the same goes for what diff guys are/not attracted to, although like you pointed out crazymikey, is another story. (by the way, substitute 'OTT' for 'out there' or 'flamboyant' if you feel over the top is an attack to you or offensive/misrepresentaive of your view of flamboyant guys much like were debating the language of 'str8 acting' now as well while youre at it :) )

It's just those self-righteous gay guys that are basically going 'youre not gay acting or over the top enough to be out of the closet and its cramping my style' kind that put us in a different kind of stereotypical closet that really gets under my skin.

I just think a lot of live and let live needs to be done, like a lot of you guys have said.

P.S sorry for the lengthy posts guys, is that ok here? I guess im just really passionate re this topic huh :P

There are 44 more comments. View them all