Getting into The Peel – acomplicated guide

www.samesame.com.au
  • 61
  • 2
  • 3461

Back in 2007, Melbourne’s The Peel Hotel made international headlines with its legally-enforced and controversial door policy. Five years later, getting into the venue is still difficult… if you’re a woman.

The Peel had won a landmark case allowing it to legally refuse entry to heterosexual people. Sorry girls – no more hen’s nights. It was a first-of-its-kind decision in Australia and thought to be unique across the globe, as the venue’s owner sought to ensure his beloved bar remained a gay male-focused nightspot.

Last year that exemption to anti-discrimination laws was renewed, but to comply with privacy protection provisions of Victoria’s Charter of Human Rights, staff at the venue were simply advised they could no longer ask about someone’s sexuality at the door.

The Peel’s owner Tom McFeely insists his staff must still deny access to anyone they feel threatens the safety or comfort of patrons inside “or its position as an openly gay venue.”

As women continue to find themselves turned away from The Peel – or getting forced to line up outside while men are waved on through – frustration with the situation has spilled out onto Facebook where an End the sexist door policy at the Peel group now numbers 500 people. Many of the group’s members are upset that their female friends are being turned away from the venue on its busier nights, and accuse McFeely of “thinly-veiled misogyny”.

“The Peel is one of the few accessible (free) queer venues in Melbourne,” the group’s creator points out. “It is shameful that women (queer or otherwise) are bullied and humiliated on the street.”

McFeely took the criticism seriously, taking out full-page ads in local gay media, endeavoring to explain the bar’s policies.

“Let me state clearly and without apology that The Peel is a venue provided for gay men – and NOT for everyone,” he thundered. “Keeping it gay has never been an easy task, and it has ALWAYS generated controversy.

“The comfort, enjoyment, and safety of gay males is The Peel’s PRIME Directive.”

But what about their female friends or lesbians seeking a fun night out? “Another misconception is that gay male regulars cannot come to The Peel with friends. This is NOT the case,” McFeely’s missive continues. “They can. However, everyone is required to respect The Peel’s Prime Directive, and sometimes this may mean some people are asked to queue or to adjust certain behaviour.”

Speaking of ‘certain behaviour’, The Peel now gets specific about all this and more on its official website. Study all the rules below…

McFeely says the responses he’s had to The Peel’s door policies have varied widely from “a humbling and overwhelming show of support and encouragement,” to a “continual onslaught of legal threats and personal attacks.”

But it seems he’s not backing down anytime soon. The former Liberal Party candidate tells Same Same he acknowledges how controversial his rules are but he’s sticking with them.

“With regard to women and everyone else who is not a gay man, I would hope they take the time to digest my message and respect myself and my team for standing up for what we believe in,” he explains. “As well as this, The Peel is private business. Should we for example, demand that Suzanne’s clothing stores start stocking men’s Jocks?”

Heterosexual punters are well catered for with other Melbourne venues, so can very easily enjoy a night out with the lads or girls – but gay guys really benefit from having their own unique space to be themselves in, McFeely suggests.

“Although many individuals in society did not enjoy a well nurtured childhood, I would argue that in most part they were probably surrounded by a family that was essentially the same as them,” he elaborates. “But a lot of gay people grew up having to listen to disparaging names and insults being thrown around the living room when someone with a ‘lisp’ was on the telly, at the same time knowing it would have been impossible to even broach the subject of being gay. At least a black child doesn’t have to ‘come out’ to his black family for being black in the hope they are accepted.

“Perhaps this is why so many in the community refer to others as ‘family’. For many years now the customers and staff alike have been my family. One does what one has to protect their family, and I’m doing the same.”


Is The Peel’s door policy unnecessarily discriminatory, or simply protecting the interests of its gay punters as best it can? We welcome your thoughts below.

Social

  • findrafael
  • moose6969

Comments

www.samesame.com.au arrow left
27555
someoneinatree

someoneinatree said on the 18th Apr, 2012

I find some of it misogynistic - the "know your place; shut your face" sign in particular is clearly targeting women, and it does so in an offensive manner.

I also think it is a sad world where "expressions of non gay male sexuality" are automatically deemed offensive to or necessarily discomforting for gay men. If the wider population of gay men does find non gay-male sexuality (expressed without aggression or invasion of space) offensive, then I find it an indictment on our maturity. I feel the same way when gay men are grossed out when anyone talks about female sexuality or genitalia generally. Grow-up gentlemen.

Finally, some of the wording is deliberately ambiguous (such as wearing clothing that is "unsuitable or unsafe"), which can easily lead to accusations of unspoken bias when different staff interpret this differently. The classic example people use is open-toed shoes. If it's ok for a drag queen to wear them, it should be ok for a cis-gendered female to wear them. If you want to police what people wear, have a dress code and state it clearly.

Having said all that, I'm fine with the principle that it is a venue predominantly for gay men. The banning of behaviour that is homophobic or that treats gay male sexuality as a spectacle (hens nights in particular) is perfectly logical.

The prioritisation of entry also makes sense, but only when the venue is already nearing capacity. Policing strict door policies when the venue is near empty is always ridiculous.

It is the occasionally offensive language used and the extremity, and unreliability, of its policing of the issue that is really the core problem here.

NATEE

NATEE said on the 24th Apr, 2012

NATEE, you need to open your eyes and ears abit more, there are constant complaints about oxford st and how its loss its true gay ghetto vibe and many business that have gone from being gay venues to mixed, not to mention the amount of straight venues popping up in the area. Even festivals like Mardi Gras get stung with critisim from the GLBTI community that its too commercialised and too 'straight freindly'.

What 3 out of 4 melbourne gay clubs got shut down? The only gay nightclub that has closed in recent years is the Market.

Once again Virgin you are missing the point, of course it will eventually lead to a mixed venue, that in a way is inevitable. A lot of heterosexuals are becoming tolerant and understanding towards homosexuality. It is not up to us to refuse people based on sexuality that is very primitive and discriminative. As I said a lot of 'gay' club promoters in Sydney do other things to entice gay patrons rather then just your average every saturday night clubbing, where heterosexual girls bring their heterosexual male friends. For example festivals such as Daywash, Love Muscle, Homesexual, MIA, Stonewall with their male competitions and etc. Those places are usually 90% gay guys.

Even heterosexual venues like the Beresford promote to a homosexual audience. For most clubs it is about business and what will bring in business and customers. Most gay venues in Sydney like Nevermind, Shift, Stonewall, Slides, have still a highly significant amount of gay blokes that go. Arq is probably one of the only ones that is mixed up especially on Saturday nights.

Mardi gras is straight friendly, because huge numbers of heterosexuals are accepting towards homosexuals. Knowing that ones sexuality does not make a person any different. Why be entirely exclusive when we have the ability to be inclusive for all different types of people.

Unfortunately this Peel hotel in MELBOURNE is stuck in an era where discrimination was much higher and fear and intimidation controlled peoples mind set about homosexuals.

Still, personally I would prefer to live in Sydney. Seems gay and straight friendly to me. Why ask for civil rights if we (as homosexuals including this Peel Hotel) are not practicing what we preach.

My apologies on that, I did hear other gay venues close in melbourne as well.