Why have Pride?

www.samesame.com.au

About the Author

www.samesame.com.au

Shannon B

  • 15
  • 4
  • 813

Every time a Pride event pops up, so do questions about its relevance and purpose.

On the one hand you have the critics who say it’s just an excuse for a drunken sex fest, that puts on display the worst of our communities, and on the other hand you have supporters who say that it is a valuable catalyst to bring attention to GLBTI issues around the world.

This year’s World Pride in London was no different.

There is no doubt that us gays love to party, sometimes in their underwear and covered in glitter. But does this visible sexual freedom really do us any favours? Does our overt sexuality harm our cause, and perpetuate the stereotype that we are all just a bunch of drunken gym bunnies looking for sex?

The gay community wants its sexuality to be a non-issue for the rest of the world and yet for us it IS the issue. The resulting paradox is that Pride events celebrate sexuality instead of gay culture. You don’t need to look far to see just how much of the GLBTI community rejects “gay” culture as superficial, discriminatory and plastic. I myself have become less and less excited by gay culture over the past two years and although I still attend events like Mardi Gras there are few other events that inspire me.

“Does our overt sexuality harm our cause?”

I remember my coming out experience. I always told people that I didn’t care if people found out I’m gay, but I don’t walk in to a room and say “Hi, I’m Shannon the gay guy.” When you look at the media the gay community is all about declaring its sexuality. Do straight people walk around saying “Hi I’m John Smith and I’m straight”?

Sure, it’s our sexuality that sets us apart and is the reason for so much of our struggle, but we are all so much more than what we do in the bedroom.

Pride as a celebration of sexuality is an incredibly narrow representation of our communities.

And as our sexuality becomes less and less of an issue, so will the relevance of Pride. It is why those of us who see sexuality as only a small part of who we are, feel a disconnection from the gay community at large. Nearly all surveys of public opinion demonstrate a belief in equality and for the most part this has been achieved. Not all the work is done, but in the West where Pride is suffering an identity crisis, there are fewer and fewer people left to fight other than religious fanatics and old grey-haired politicians who peddle fear and hypocrisy.

To survive, Pride needs to stop celebrating sexuality and evolve in to a celebration of Gay culture in ALL its diversity – not the homogenised version we see on club posters and in the gay media.

We should be celebrating our contribution to the world, rather than our ass-less chaps, penchant for drag and anyone over 6ft tall with pecs.

Floats like the Armed Forces, Police, and the Lifesavers are important in showing the community that gay people are making worthwhile and valuable contributions to mainstream organisations.

But do the Lifesavers (which I march with) really need to dance in their Speedos? Don’t we just look like all the other almost nude people dancing down the street? Wouldn’t a more effective demonstration be to march up Oxford St in our Patrol uniforms, with some of the people we have saved?

Wouldn’t the message “my life was saved by a lifesaver with Pride” be a greater statement?

The question of identity and who we present ourselves to be will always be a question for the GLBTI community, and it is one that I am sure will be debated for a long time to come. There is too much at stake for us to simply continue with “business as usual”. GLBTI youth are still the most likely to attempt suicide, there are countries where people are still murdered for their sexuality and there are places where state sanctioned violence and discrimination still exist against GLBTI people. Surely we let these people down as a community every time we throw a thinly disguised party and call it a Pride event.

It’s ok to have a party. If people want to dance down the street in a Speedo or a jock strap then they should be free to do so, but lets call it what it is, a party and save Pride for those events that reflect a genuine celebration of GLBTI culture and diversity.

It’s time we take a good look at ourselves and decide what we stand for and just what there is to have Pride in.


The photos on this page are of Pride London 2012 by John Goodridge.

Catch up with more from Shannon on his blog here.

Social

  • mattrenwick
  • dracon388
  • jamesbesanvalle
  • Husky-D

Comments

www.samesame.com.au arrow left
28403
crystalsinger

crystalsinger said on the 18th Jul, 2012

Wow. So much misunderstanding of what Pride is all about in this article!

Pride is a REACTION to countless decades (centuries really) of queer folk being discriminated against, denied basic human rights, hated, beaten up, and even killed for no other reason than our sexuality. Those who have historically persecuted chose to see as as nothing more than our sexuality, not us. Pride is a movement that seeks to RECLAIM our sexuality from those who would use it to define us solely.

WE know that sexuality is only one part of who we are. WE didn't choose to make it the focus of drama, that was done by others who used it as a flimsy excuse to exercise their fearful bigotry.

Pride says, "So you think that being queer is something sinful, shameful, even evil? Well, fuck you! It's not, and we'll no longer accept your hatred and violence." It is a way of taking what others use to persecute us, stare them down, and let them know that there is nothing shameful about being who we are. Simple as that.

When you suggest that we need to accommodate the delicate sensibilities of those who still, by and large, see us as "less than" just because of our sexuality, you allow others to continue to define us by our sexuality alone. When being gay is no longer stigmatised, when we're no longer vastly over-represented in depression and suicide statistics, when we can be ourselves in public without ever having to fear verbal or physical violence - THEN we can say that our sexuality is no longer used by society at large to define us. Then and only then will the need for a display of Pride be unnecessary.

MrAsh

MrAsh said on the 19th Jul, 2012

I accept your personal choice to not support MG, but I'm often astounded by many of the comments logged in these forums (could it be the gay autistic thing that seems to resound with so many here?) that imply since you stated your own experience then there can be no room for any other position. Case in point your comment "I do not think there are any other considerations".

We live in a community which is largely based on pluralism; on a philosophy of 'live and let live' and yet I'm constantly amazed at many of the comments in these forums (& not only yours DavoJimbo by any means) that imply that "Since my experience was X there can be no position Y".

As Tony Jones would say you can take that as a comment.

As a person who has been diagnosed as being a part of the autistic spectrum, I take offence to that derisive remark about autistic gays. For your information people on the autistic spectrum are diverse (more neuro-diverse) and are from all walks of life and in saying that, not all of us are neurologically wired the same way, some think mono, some think stereo, some think tri frequency and so on. Just because a person is rigid and insular in thinking or ideas, does not make them automatically autistic.

There are neuro-typical (non-autistic) who are narrow minded, ignorant and dissmissive of other perspectives to arguments. This is for a whole range of reasons and until you know who they are, you can't say why they think like that.

Also if you read any online forum or letters to the editor section in newspapers or magazines, most of the it is full of 'my experience is x there can be no position y' opinions.

:mad: