Drag show slammed: 'It's notOK to say tranny'

www.samesame.com.au
  • 141
  • 1
  • 3355

A new comedy set for Sydney Opera House is under fire from transpeople who view the word “tranny” as just as offensive as “faggot” or the n-word.

Starring popular drag queen singer Trevor Ashley, trAnnie will be an adults-only take on the adventures of ginger kid Annie. In the show, set to take to the stage this December, a ginger-haired orphan boy seeks gender reassignment surgery.

But its title is an increasingly controversial derogatory term used to describe transgender people – and several have contacted Same Same with concerns about the dehumanising and hurtful way the word “tranny” is used to describe them.

Many feel that it is not OK for anyone who isn’t a transgender woman to use the word, and they’re also concerned about the gender reassignment plot of the show – trivialising the deeply personal journeys of real-life transpeople.

“It is so painful to see members of the GLBT community ridiculing the most marginalised and discriminated against part of our supposed rainbow family,” says one of several trans and cis-gendered readers who contacted us after we revealed details about the show last week.

“It’s not OK for a gay drag queen to mock the lived experience of a community he is not part of.”

“Trans people are not drag queens,” he points out. “Yes there is some shared history in the Sydney gay scene and some gay men may feel a sense of connection to trans women in particular, but the truth is that it’s not OK for a gay drag queen to mock the lived experience of a community he is not part of.

“The reality is that surgeries for trans people are often out of reach. The reality is that trans people all around the world are beaten, harassed and murdered every day. The reality is that trans people are excluded from anti-discrimination laws and forgotten in the ‘gay marriage’ frenzy,” he adds.

“All of this is my personal opinion and I would never speak for the entire trans community. I know some who feel the way I do and some who couldn’t care less what Trevor Ashley does. I share my words with you because I am committed to being a queer trans guy who positively speaks up for what I believe in and when I read the synopsis for TrAnnie I felt such anguish I couldn’t stand by.”

Chai Edi Palila has similar concerns about the show. Writing on the Wipe Out Transphobia website, she suspects the production “will rely on the same, usual and un-original cheap jokes and mocks made about trans women and our bodies, the so-called ‘humour’ of men in women’s cloths, usage of the offensive term ‘trannie’, focus on what genitals trans women have and why trans women aren’t ‘really women’ until we have a ‘sex change’, ‘his/her’ puns, making puns on popular lyrics to add further injury, like ‘your son will come out tomorrow’, and usage of incorrect pronouns that many girls like us have begun to expect when we see our lives talked about in the media or trivialised for comedic purposes.

“For many of these reasons above, the show is also highly exploitative of trans women, as we are such a dis-empowered group that is usually shunned when we speak out when the above is done to us.”

Sorry… but the show will go on

In response to the controversy, the show’s creator Trevor Ashley and the Sydney Opera House have released a statement, beginning with an apology.

“Sydney Opera House and Trevor Ashley wish to apologise to those offended by the title of the play ‘trAnnie’,” it says.

“The title ‘trAnnie’ is a play on words. It is a play on the musical Annie and combines the letters of Trevor’s name into the title. It is also a play on the fact that the central character is transsexual.”

Ashley himself adds: “Although I appreciate that the word may brush some transgendered people up the wrong way, the intent is not to harm, but take the sting out of what I’m sure could be a painful word for some.

“Being a part of the GLBTQI community for many years, we are people who can reclaim words that have been used in harmful ways towards us in the past.”

He explains that the production, while being a comedy, shows the transgender character in a positive light and hopes to encourage more understanding of the transgender community.

The troublesome ‘T’ word is becoming increasingly controversial as more transgender Australians voice their concern when it is used. Despite this, there is still some work to do if seeking to remove it in the context of gay male drag entertainment.

At least two Sydney bars promote ‘Tranny Bingo’ nights each week… posters for one of them are shown below.

Social

  • MrAsh

Comments

www.samesame.com.au arrow left
29075
SeaMist

SeaMist said on the 3rd Oct, 2012

Thank you for those who support trans womens rights to be offended by the title of this show. For the others imagine this:

A white guy called Nigel writes a musical about the trials and tribulations of tigger (see pooh bear) Tigger wakes up one morning and finds he has turned black. What will tigger do?
Now what will we call the musical....I know Nigel....tigger....Nigel...tigger. Lets call the show Nigger!!!
On announcing our wonderful new show we get all these calls from people of colour all upset about the title. Why don't they get a sense of humour. I mean apart from being about somone who is black it's nothing to do with them. I don't find the word offensive and neither do some coloured people. What are they on about?
Does this even sound remotely ok? If it does seek help, because no one should have that degree of internalised privilege.

If no, well that is exactly what is being done to trans women. Someone not trans is deciding for them what they can and cannot find offensive, and even though they are now aware the the term IS offensive to quite a few trans women, what the hell, we'll go ahead and run it anyway, because I'm not trans and I get to decide. Just like the white guy in the scenario gets to decide what is offensive or not for people of colour. This is privilege. It's something everone here fights against when the hetero community uses it against all of us. Using it against the most marginalised parts of the GLBTI community is just as wrong.
Oh, and if you are wondering why so many of us don't like it google 'tranny'. Count how many sites there are before you find one single positive reference.
Oh and yes it does refer to transvestites, but also to transwomen. The hetero public often can't tell the difference anyway.

Mama Catastrophe

Mama Catastrophe said on the 9th Oct, 2012

While Mama doesn't really like the whole trAnnie ad on SS - she understands that as a business, SS relies on advertising revenue to continue operating. Of course it would be great if SS only featured the wonderful advertisers like VAC or Headspace, but unfortunately these organisations don't usually have the massive advertising budget needed to be featured on SS continually. So that leaves SS seeking out other advertisers. Now when looking for sites to advertise on, business look at two things - target market and/or traffic. An example of this is something like the Liberati Gay cruise that's currently being advertised on SS - the operators want to expose their product to as many of their target market as possible so SS would be the obvious choice for where to spend their advertising dollars as it is Australia's #1 (traffic) gay and lesbian (target market) site. This works great for SS if the advertiser is aiming specifically for the GLBT market but what if their target market is more generic - like 20 - 40 year old professionals? In cases like this the advertiser would looking at sites with the most amount of traffic to advertise on and unfortunately SS probably cant compete with the traffic some other sites generate, so adverting on SS probably wouldn't be considered good value for advertisers. There is of course another variable that would effect advertisers decision to spend the dollars at SS and that's content. Now unfortunately there's always gonna be business that will neverr advertise on SS just coz its a GLBTI site and nothing we do will change this - thier loss. However there may also be advertisers who don't give two rats arses about it being a GLBT site but do care that some of the content (mainly in the forums) borders on soft core porn - and Mama holds her hand up for contributing to this before ya'll start banging on at her.

Mama thinks we should give SS a bit of slack when it comes to the advertising that appears on the site. It may not be ideal but it cant be easy attracting advertisers here given all the above. If ya'll serious about the advertising ya'll could help out though. Start contributing to the site with fresh, creative ideas that attract traffic to the site - more traffic means more advertisers looking to advertise, which means SS being able to be more choosy with advertsiers

MrAsh

MrAsh said on the 10th Oct, 2012

While Mama doesn't really like the whole trAnnie ad on SS - she understands that as a business, SS relies on advertising revenue to continue operating. Of course it would be great if SS only featured the wonderful advertisers like VAC or Headspace, but unfortunately these organisations don't usually have the massive advertising budget needed to be featured on SS continually. So that leaves SS seeking out other advertisers. Now when looking for sites to advertise on, business look at two things - target market and/or traffic. An example of this is something like the Liberati Gay cruise that's currently being advertised on SS - the operators want to expose their product to as many of their target market as possible so SS would be the obvious choice for where to spend their advertising dollars as it is Australia's #1 (traffic) gay and lesbian (target market) site. This works great for SS if the advertiser is aiming specifically for the GLBT market but what if their target market is more generic - like 20 - 40 year old professionals? In cases like this the advertiser would looking at sites with the most amount of traffic to advertise on and unfortunately SS probably cant compete with the traffic some other sites generate, so adverting on SS probably wouldn't be considered good value for advertisers. There is of course another variable that would effect advertisers decision to spend the dollars at SS and that's content. Now unfortunately there's always gonna be business that will neverr advertise on SS just coz its a GLBTI site and nothing we do will change this - thier loss. However there may also be advertisers who don't give two rats arses about it being a GLBT site but do care that some of the content (mainly in the forums) borders on soft core porn - and Mama holds her hand up for contributing to this before ya'll start banging on at her.

Mama thinks we should give SS a bit of slack when it comes to the advertising that appears on the site. It may not be ideal but it cant be easy attracting advertisers here given all the above. If ya'll serious about the advertising ya'll could help out though. Start contributing to the site with fresh, creative ideas that attract traffic to the site - more traffic means more advertisers looking to advertise, which means SS being able to be more choosy with advertsiers

Mama I agree with your sentiment. Yet I do believe SameSame and it's parent company Sound Alliance have an ethical obligation to not support or promote discrimination towards GLBTIQ people in any form, including advertisements they run.

SameSame is one of the media voices of GLBTIQ Australia and a lot of people would perceive it as a weather bell of the sentiments of GLBTIQ culture in Australia, especially those who are not connected to the main urban GLBTIQ cultures and if SameSame openly allows transphobic/homophobic (or any phobic) advertising in any form, they are in one way approving it.

Also Sound Alliance are happy to censor a word like 'nigger' (and snigger, sniggering, sniggers etc...) and they attempted to censor the word 'cunt' from SameSame until there was a backlash about it. So why should they allow the term 'Trannie' which is offensive to a marginalised and very misunderstood part of GLBTIQ culture and a sub group who needs as much support as it can get in gaining equality and acceptance.

As for the contribution to SameSame I honestly think Sound Alliance should do what the Community radio stations do and have a fund raising drive.

The_Freak

The_Freak said on the 10th Oct, 2012

Mama I agree with your sentiment. Yet I do believe SameSame and it's parent company Sound Alliance have an ethical obligation to not support or promote discrimination towards GLBTIQ people in any form, including advertisements they run.

SameSame is one of the media voices of GLBTIQ Australia and a lot of people would perceive it as a weather bell of the sentiments of GLBTIQ culture in Australia, especially those who are not connected to the main urban GLBTIQ cultures and if SameSame openly allows transphobic/homophobic (or any phobic) advertising in any form, they are in one way approving it.

Also Sound Alliance are happy to censor a word like '******' (and s******, s******ing, s******s etc...) and they attempted to censor the word 'cunt' from SameSame until there was a backlash about it. So why should they allow the term 'Trannie' which is offensive to a marginalised and very misunderstood part of GLBTIQ culture and a sub group who needs as much support as it can get in gaining equality and acceptance.

As for the contribution to SameSame I honestly think Sound Alliance should do what the Community radio stations do and have a fund raising drive.

Old Freaky's not trying to downplay the importance of what you are saying, MrAsh

I'm just trying to figure out what the words are that Sound Alliance censored that start with "s"?

I'm guessing it's not "sashaying"?

Mind you, I've always thought that word should be censored! ........ Sashaying indeed! :eek::eek::D

There are 40 more comments. View them all