PDA

View Full Version : Kane's kitchen may well rule!


crazzymikey
13th April 2011, 06:05 PM
I am hoping they win!

good t see a gay guy and his fag hag doing so well :)

Gloomis666
13th April 2011, 06:36 PM
Why is it "Kanes kitchen"?
we all know the chinese chick got the balls.

crazzymikey
13th April 2011, 06:55 PM
lol they work really well together which is one of their big strengths. I agree that the girl is probably a little better a cook but watching them you can see they both know what they are doing.

Gloomis666
13th April 2011, 06:59 PM
yeah but she is yum and toned also hot looking while he looks like something that fell out of a pelicans ass and landed on a rock last week when I was tryng to catch a salmon.

Totka
13th April 2011, 07:03 PM
I think they have no chance of winning. They chicks they are up against are better by miles.

Gloomis666
13th April 2011, 07:25 PM
hmm have to watch the ol Italin chick, they got a few tricks up the sleeve.

ernesto_1
13th April 2011, 07:30 PM
wot is this kanes kitchen?

Gloomis666
13th April 2011, 07:32 PM
It's a show called my Kitchen rules.

crazzymikey
13th April 2011, 07:40 PM
yeah but she is yum and toned also hot looking while he looks like something that fell out of a pelicans ass and landed on a rock last week when I was tryng to catch a salmon.

thats really harsh, he is cute

crazzymikey
13th April 2011, 07:41 PM
I think they have no chance of winning. They chicks they are up against are better by miles.

yeah those girls are amazing cooks but kane an lee have a talent for surprise and being very original

Dion
13th April 2011, 10:18 PM
And the girls won, 2 10's and 4 9's for 56/60. Kane and Lee 4 9's and 2 8's for 52/60.
cheers,
Dion.

crazzymikey
13th April 2011, 10:52 PM
I wouldnt be surprised to see the italian gals with their own tv show and seeing more of kane and lee but the girls although brilliant cooks are boring whingers without that interesting I want to watch them factor.

ernesto_1
13th April 2011, 11:07 PM
another "win" another cook book deal another year.

Virgindirk
13th April 2011, 11:14 PM
And now its only 2 and1/2 weeks until the start of masterchef. Seriously, with all these cooking competition/reality shows on tv , eventually ratings will struggle and viewers will get sick of it, I know i already am.

ernesto_1
13th April 2011, 11:21 PM
i am so sick of cooking shows. masterchef willl seriously suffer as a result coz of this flood of celebrity cooks.

too many cooks in the kitchen lah

Virgindirk
13th April 2011, 11:36 PM
Masterchef is pretty much going the same way as Big Brother and Australian Idol did. Both BB and AI wereboth massive hit shows when they first started, but then ch.10 decided to flog the shit out of them at any given opportunity and viewers got sick of it, ratings took a dive and both shows eventually got axed.And don't get me started on what the former conestants of these are doing now.

crazzymikey
13th April 2011, 11:41 PM
I love these cooking shows! Its renewed my interes tin cooking. I say if your no tinto it then don't watch them. Ratings are still the highest for them

Virgindirk
13th April 2011, 11:53 PM
I love these cooking shows! Its renewed my interes tin cooking. I say if your no tinto it then don't watch them. Ratings are still the highest for them

I dont watch them, but i keep hearing/reading about them wherever i go just like I did with Big Brother and Aus. Idol. Cooking shows are in fashion atm, but like fashion itself many trends and fads come and go pretty quickly and the sad thing is people like Julie Goodwin, Kane & Lilly etc. are put on pedistals,given all the media asskissing and treated like B-list celebrites.....until the public get sick of them and move on the the next tv fad/trend.

ernesto_1
13th April 2011, 11:57 PM
the next fad is ME. im going to apply for Big Brother... if it ever gets back on. X factor requires some talent which i have none of!

Virgindirk
14th April 2011, 12:23 AM
You can be a judge....most of them dont have much talent.

chad_74
14th April 2011, 12:44 AM
sadly Kane and Lee lost,not because they were the lessor cooks but because they appeared too gay.They only lost due to the "matthew mitchem"factor.This type of shitting over the top of gay people shows how backward this country in thinking and acting on equality for us.We are ok to be seen as a freak show but recognising our talents is a no no.Due to the extensive bigotry and hatred against us no supermarket would allow us to win because they may be boycotted by showing they support us.

badamj2000
14th April 2011, 12:58 AM
I dont watch these 'cooking shows'. I must be the only one in the country!!!

Virgindirk
14th April 2011, 01:16 AM
sadly Kane and Lee lost,not because they were the lessor cooks but because they appeared too gay.They only lost due to the "matthew mitchem"factor.This type of shitting over the top of gay people shows how backward this country in thinking and acting on equality for us.We are ok to be seen as a freak show but recognising our talents is a no no.Due to the extensive bigotry and hatred against us no supermarket would allow us to win because they may be boycotted by showing they support us.

Are you kidding? They lost simply cause they were outdone by the opposition, not beacuse one of them is openly gay.They made final, if they were being victimised by extensive bigotry and hatred then they probably would have been elimated weeks ago.

And what the fuck is the Matthew Mitcham factor and what on earth as he got to do with Kane and Lilly losing the final? Last time i checked Matthew Mitchem WON a gold medal, and he won because he had talant and trained hard, not because of his sexuality and he was open about being gay before he competed in the Bejing games.

crazzymikey
14th April 2011, 02:16 AM
sadly Kane and Lee lost,not because they were the lessor cooks but because they appeared too gay.They only lost due to the "matthew mitchem"factor.This type of shitting over the top of gay people shows how backward this country in thinking and acting on equality for us.We are ok to be seen as a freak show but recognising our talents is a no no.Due to the extensive bigotry and hatred against us no supermarket would allow us to win because they may be boycotted by showing they support us.

well I don't know where you got that frm but I believe it was close and they lost because the asian cuisine they offered didnt appeal as much to the juges as you may have noticed none of them are asian cuisine chefs its no surprise their tastes and desires lie with the more european cuisine of the other girls.

I dont get why they got 10 though and risotto? how boring. it looked liek shit lol obviously I dont like rissotto hehe.

anyways at the end of this its obvious who we will see mroe of which is kane and lee and the italian chicks they ahev so much more persoanlity

crazzymikey
14th April 2011, 02:19 AM
I dont watch them, but i keep hearing/reading about them wherever i go just like I did with Big Brother and Aus. Idol. Cooking shows are in fashion atm, but like fashion itself many trends and fads come and go pretty quickly and the sad thing is people like Julie Goodwin, Kane & Lilly etc. are put on pedistals,given all the media asskissing and treated like B-list celebrites.....until the public get sick of them and move on the the next tv fad/trend.

cooking shows have alwyas been popular, I agree that there is an increased fashionable fad at moment with the reality aspect

Matt Akersten
14th April 2011, 09:22 AM
A shame they didn't win. They did so well! An exciting show last night. And I learned how to do new things with tufu...

lukehuggett
14th April 2011, 09:33 AM
Perspective on the above tedium you may be experiencing with cooking shows...

http://hungrybeast.abc.net.au/stories/spoilers

ernesto_1
14th April 2011, 09:54 AM
they couldnt have ripped off big brother? 3 shows doing it would mean i get more chance of getting on it.

Gloomis666
14th April 2011, 12:42 PM
sadly Kane and Lee lost,not because they were the lessor cooks but because they appeared too gay.They only lost due to the "matthew mitchem"factor.This type of shitting over the top of gay people shows how backward this country in thinking and acting on equality for us.We are ok to be seen as a freak show but recognising our talents is a no no.Due to the extensive bigotry and hatred against us no supermarket would allow us to win because they may be boycotted by showing they support us.
The winner wins the game the loser wins the war.

I thought they did pretty well indeed, to get as far as they did.

I also think she looks awsome...

JarrodJ
14th April 2011, 02:01 PM
sadly Kane and Lee lost,not because they were the lessor cooks but because they appeared too gay.They only lost due to the "matthew mitchem"factor.This type of shitting over the top of gay people shows how backward this country in thinking and acting on equality for us.We are ok to be seen as a freak show but recognising our talents is a no no.Due to the extensive bigotry and hatred against us no supermarket would allow us to win because they may be boycotted by showing they support us.


PLEASE!

From what I heard, the girls cooked a much more technically difficult meal, plus they have showed variety throughout the series. Notice how the other team ALWAYS cooked Asian meals whenever they had a a choice? Not a lot of variety.

For you to claim bigotry that a gay team came 2nd out of 12th (not to mention all the other straight teams that DIDN'T get through) actually does worse for how gays are perceived than for a team with one gay member to "not win" a show like this.

It took me about half a second of watching Kane to realise that he was almost certainly gay. I also realised that he was probably being himself and not putting on a persona.
How is that acting like a freak show?

Thinking back to past reality shows, Masterchef series 2 had an open gay in the final 4, and I think a second in the final 6.

Big brother one year had an open (and VERY flamboyant) gay in the finals and he only lost by a few percent. This was astounding because he was actually an "Intruder" and they generally have NO chance at winning.

Also Talkin' Bout Your Generation features a homosexual Josh Thomas on as a main cast member. Ruby Rose has appeared several times.

We have a variety of different types of LGBT characters on Australian TV, but it seems like if someone is "too gay" then it's a network exploiting a "freakshow", but if they are "straight acting", then it's the network "playing safe".

I took an instant disliking to Kane as not only did I not like his personality but I didn't find their food to be that impressive (as far as I could tell). I was very surprised that their team was in the finals, but very relieved that they didn't win.

Gloomis666
14th April 2011, 02:09 PM
hey remember big brother and the flamboyant gay guy (the blondie one from memory) right and he was getting it off with some wog guy in the shower and big brother asked him about it, but them it just dissapeared from the script, as if it never happened.

There was a gay relationship going down but big brother quashed it.

Big Brother was in fact homophobic family freindly media.

JarrodJ
14th April 2011, 02:15 PM
hey remember big brother and the flamboyant gay guy (the blondie one from memory) right and he was getting it off with some wog guy in the shower and big brother asked him about it, but them it just dissapeared from the script, as if it never happened.

There was a gay relationship going down but big brother quashed it.

Big Brother was in fact homophobic family freindly media.

I think you're talking about Country boy David and the other guy Michael? Where they used trick editing to make it look like they were kissing?

mark_
14th April 2011, 02:33 PM
…Big Brother was in fact homophobic …
Nonsense!! that show was very liberal with almost no censorship

JarrodJ
14th April 2011, 02:41 PM
Let's not forget the year they introduced a second gay guy, obviously in hopes that he would click with farmer David.

I believe they also aired Farmer David's big rant about why Australia should have gay marriage?

(Although, they did cut to a long shot upon David's elimination when he was about to kiss his partner)

chad_74
14th April 2011, 05:49 PM
ask yourself why is matthew mitchem not rolling in money like other gold medalists?
I dont think he even got an uncle tobys endorsement.

JarrodJ
14th April 2011, 05:52 PM
Ask yourself how Matthew Mitchem is involved with My Kitchen Rules and then refer yourself to my response to your previous post.

JarrodJ
14th April 2011, 05:53 PM
Also look at this list of Australian Olympic gold medalists and tell me which ones you know are rolling in millions and which ones aren't.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Olympic_gold_medalists_for_Australia

Edited to add: I am not saying there is no discrimination in Australia towards LGBT people. But just because An LGBT person doesn't get everything they want, it doesn't mean homophobia was at play.

chad_74
14th April 2011, 06:12 PM
jarrod luv gay people are not marketable to promote products or companies.
Of course these shows are rigged its about the winners reinforcing the supermarkets /sponsors image.

crazzymikey
14th April 2011, 06:18 PM
so over these stupid arguements on here people listen to yourselves! lol

chad_74
14th April 2011, 06:20 PM
another note of interest is the chairmain of coles and westfarmers,

JarrodJ
14th April 2011, 06:30 PM
jarrod luv gay people are not marketable to promote products or companies.
Of course these shows are rigged its about the winners reinforcing the supermarkets /sponsors image.

Hold you are are avoiding an argument that you made. You asked me how Matthew Mitchem wasnt rolling in millions the way other Olympic gold medalists are.
my response is that very few of them are.

Why do you think all the other straight Olympic gold medalists aren't rolling in millions?

You seem to think that just cos someone is gay, they are entitled to everything they want, and anything less is homophobia.

If MKR were going to rig the show for marketability they would have made those two Italian women the winners, they were clearly fan favourites. Likewise, if Masterchef were going to rig the show for marketability last year, Marian would have easily won.

You aren't really making very good arguments to back up your claims. Remember, Kane didn't "lose", he came 2nd. He came 2nd in a finale which reached over 2 million Aussie viewers.

Gloomis666
14th April 2011, 08:13 PM
I think you're talking about Country boy David and the other guy Michael? Where they used trick editing to make it look like they were kissing?

It was that skinny gay guy from the gold coast, well he was getting off with that short quiet wog guy in the shower.
There was one episode where big brother questioned him about kissing somone and he admitted to it.

After that the whole thing was silenced.

It was easy to miss as it was only mentioned once.

JarrodJ
14th April 2011, 08:15 PM
I don't remember this.
Although the point that it was "buried" is kind of moot considering it was mentioned/shown at all.

Gloomis666
14th April 2011, 08:16 PM
Nonsense!! that show was very liberal with almost no censorship

lol! where you a big fan?

Gloomis666
14th April 2011, 08:18 PM
I don't remember this.
Although the point that it was "buried" is kind of moot considering it was mentioned/shown at all.
was probably shown then dropped, would happen in reality shows.
what is moot?

mark_
14th April 2011, 08:19 PM
(maybe)

JarrodJ
14th April 2011, 08:47 PM
was probably shown then dropped, would happen in reality shows.
what is moot?

I mean the point that "The Big Brother producers covered up this gay thing" is moot due to the fact that it actually was shown on TV.

For this to have happened, and then someone be called to the diary room to be questioned about it would involve quite a bit of production work so if there was some "cover-up" it certainly couldn't have happened live, or didn't happen at all.

I don't doubt anyone's sincerity in relaying this story, but the mind and memory can play tricks on people.

If it aired, there would be footage of it out there and someone would have more details than the vague things offered in this thread.

Also, if it aired, it would probably have been a bigger media stir than this video.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ti1cmtbZmlc

Gloomis666
14th April 2011, 09:00 PM
yes he was called to the diary room.
never seen that bit, I actually havnt watched it in a while.

must be not so homophobic these days.

ernesto_1
14th April 2011, 09:46 PM
the cook book is out friday bitches. and its 12.95. buy it!

JarrodJ
14th April 2011, 09:58 PM
yes he was called to the diary room.
never seen that bit, I actually havnt watched it in a while.

must be not so homophobic these days.

The video I posted was quite homophobic in context because nothing actually happened between those two. One was gay, the other was just oddly friendly, and those two were just playing around.
They showed it on TV that way to imply that there was some gay stuff happening and to sort of make fun of the non-gay one.

Gloomis666
14th April 2011, 10:44 PM
The video I posted was quite homophobic in context because nothing actually happened between those two. One was gay, the other was just oddly friendly, and those two were just playing around.
They showed it on TV that way to imply that there was some gay stuff happening and to sort of make fun of the non-gay one.

yeah but doubt they was going to televise what was goin down after that kiss...

there was a non gay one?

Im not so gay in that respect, though he looked preety much initiating the kiss so dunno..

JarrodJ
14th April 2011, 11:10 PM
yeah but doubt they was going to televise what was goin down after that kiss...

there was a non gay one?

Im not so gay in that respect, though he looked preety much initiating the kiss so dunno..

As I think I mentioned earlier, that kiss wasnt a real kiss. It was them just mucking around.

Gloomis666
14th April 2011, 11:12 PM
As I think I mentioned earlier, that kiss wasnt a real kiss. It was them just mucking around.
looked real to me, what is a real kiss ?

JarrodJ
14th April 2011, 11:25 PM
looked real to me, what is a real kiss ?

It looked real, but it wasn't. I'm not sure which of these videos clear things up but in one of them, the short haired dude tries to clear it up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ti1cmtbZmlc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H11qJhfPU1Q

The thing is, the "straight" guy was a bit of an instigator that series and kinda came off quite closeted. Once when asked (but the gay guy in the video) if he was "a homo" h said "well, Im a homosapien.. so i'm a kind of a homo... im a kind of a homo.."
Totally the kinda answer I would imagine my 18 year old self giving, and his attitude totally reminds me of my closeted self (clinging to gay guys), but that's neither here nor there.

Gloomis666
15th April 2011, 07:16 AM
It was most probably scripted

Gloomis666
15th April 2011, 08:25 AM
the cook book is out friday bitches. and its 12.95. buy it!
bugger that, I want an African cookbook, went into an African food store the other day and there was all these beans and grains and stuff I had never even seen, they guy asked me what I would like and I said I wouldn't know how to cook any of it.

badamj2000
15th April 2011, 11:54 AM
Mark is a wizz in the kitchen

chad_74
15th April 2011, 12:32 PM
Jarrod do you think matthew mitchem is treated the same as other olympic gold winners?
do you not think if he was a rug muncher he would be our nations poster boy?
As to your previous question Keiren perkins ian thorpe, grant hackett ...
kane and lee I agree did not lose even one chef called them superstars of the kitchen ,but they lost out on the $100,000......If anything it could have been a draw the two girls effort was not anywhere as good as their semi-final but perhaps they got points for the hissy fit.

JarrodJ
15th April 2011, 01:23 PM
Dude, a gold medal isn't a free ticket to guaranteed millions. I could name 20 gold medal winners that made a lot of money, but I could name 100 that didn't.

Matthew Mitcham, does have sponsorship by the way, and "financial support from Tesltra". But I'm sure you knew that.

I agree that gay people aren't easily marketed (except the ones I mentioned earlier..) But I think what is holding Matthew Mitcham, back is the fact that he's a diver. I can't name a single diver throughout history, let alone a gold medal winner, let alone an Australian. I've had to look up Matthew Mitcham's name a handful of times because I find it even hard to remember him.

I have given you ample evidence of prominent gays in our media, including reality shows. I feel that you aren't even taking in what I've said and I'm talking to a brick wall.

Once again, I am not saying that gays aren't discriminated against in general, I am not saying that we don't deserve full equality in all areas. I am gay.
But just because Kane came 2nd, and Mitch Matthew Mitcham *ONLY* got sponsorship form an underwear company anbd financial support from TELSTRA, it does not mean it was because he was gay.

For the record, here is a list of medal winners from 2008 (as Matthew was), several of these people broke world records and there is no sponsorship information for them to speak of. Matthew Mitcham has more sponsorship than most of these people.

http://goaustralia.about.com/od/eventsandfestivals/a/ozmedalists2008.htm

leverarchfile
15th April 2011, 04:06 PM
I could never make up my ind whether I would fuck Kane or not...

ernesto_1
15th April 2011, 06:51 PM
i am watching this show for the first time. it is the most drama queen show ever. "if you can cook this you'd be a hero"...


"this is what we want to do for the rest of our lives"

im like WTF... ofcourse u're gonna have to cook for the rest of ur lives. everyone has to eventually. WTF

ernesto_1
15th April 2011, 06:54 PM
the only guy i would fuck is the french chef. wot a hunk + sexy accent. it makes me want to date a hot french chef. LOL

ernesto_1
15th April 2011, 07:00 PM
manus accent is so sexy but annoying

JarrodJ
15th April 2011, 09:29 PM
"this is what we want to do for the rest of our lives"

im like WTF... ofcourse u're gonna have to cook for the rest of ur lives. everyone has to eventually. WTF

LOL!

I agree with you about Manu also. French accent is #1 for me!

Gloomis666
15th April 2011, 09:34 PM
The french are so up themselves.

JarrodJ
15th April 2011, 09:36 PM
The french are so up themselves.

I have seen these stereotype so often on American TV. I went to France and loved EVERYONE I came in contact with. Everyone was so nice and friendly and it took about half a day for me to fall in love with them all.

That's just my story though.

Gloomis666
15th April 2011, 09:47 PM
hmmm, I think its just the ones one tv hey.

JarrodJ
15th April 2011, 09:48 PM
haha yeah, and part of me thinks the reason that Americans think they are all stuck up is because Americans will roll in to France and act like they own the joint, thus getting the rude treatment. I kinda saw this happen also.

ernesto_1
15th April 2011, 09:52 PM
im reallty into pumpkin atm . so sweet n munchy

Gloomis666
15th April 2011, 09:56 PM
haha yeah, and part of me thinks the reason that Americans think they are all stuck up is because Americans will roll in to France and act like they own the joint, thus getting the rude treatment. I kinda saw this happen also.

Wow you been to France, I havn't even been to Victoria.

JarrodJ
15th April 2011, 09:57 PM
im reallty into pumpkin atm . so sweet n munchy

huh?? lol

Gloomis666
15th April 2011, 09:57 PM
im reallty into pumpkin atm . so sweet n munchy

I hate trying to peel them, I always cut off the skin with most the pumkin on it.

JarrodJ
15th April 2011, 09:57 PM
And Gloomis666, I've been overseas once and I'm a full 24 years old. Not that impressive!

Unless you were being sarcastic and I missed something lol

Gloomis666
15th April 2011, 09:59 PM
nope I was serious.
My sarcasm is more sarcastic than that.

JarrodJ
15th April 2011, 10:01 PM
lol sometimes it's hard to tell online, using only text. Going there again in 6.5 weeks! haha

ernesto_1
15th April 2011, 10:03 PM
im eating and watching home and away and browsing same same

Gloomis666
15th April 2011, 10:11 PM
how are you watching home and away it 10 pm?
unless of course you taped it.
Not sure why somone would want to tape it though.

Gloomis666
15th April 2011, 10:13 PM
lol sometimes it's hard to tell online, using only text. Going there again in 6.5 weeks! haha
I'm over Brisbane.

ernesto_1
15th April 2011, 10:15 PM
im watching it online. i have access to thousands of shows on ten, seven and nine. its grest!

Gloomis666
15th April 2011, 10:26 PM
my computer overheats if I watch to much video.
I have to jerk off fairly quickly.

ernesto_1
15th April 2011, 10:30 PM
ooo u animal

Gloomis666
15th April 2011, 10:44 PM
seems Jarrod has fucked off..
seems we made this thread a chat room.

ernesto_1
15th April 2011, 10:52 PM
wot did the losers get? zilch?

Gloomis666
15th April 2011, 10:55 PM
I actually have not really watched the show much, it's just background noise while Im on the computer or cooking.

JarrodJ
15th April 2011, 11:55 PM
I didn't fuck off, just stopped getting emails alerting me to activity in this thread.
Seems y'all have fucked off.

I dont mind a chat room thread.

chad_74
16th April 2011, 12:21 AM
jarrod a gay with no real talent with their only claim to fame is by being gay is not comparable to matthew mitchem.

JarrodJ
16th April 2011, 12:25 AM
jarrod a gay with no real talent with their only claim to fame is by being gay is not comparable to matthew mitchem.

You;re the one that compared the two of them, not me.

chad_74
16th April 2011, 12:28 AM
which two?

JarrodJ
16th April 2011, 12:32 AM
MKR's Kane and Matthew Mitcham.

You're the one that brought Mitcham in to the convo, and then just now asked me to compare them.
I have brought up the fact that nont only does he have sponsorship, and also dozens of gold medalists that don't.

I have mentioned several reality show contestants that are gay and have done VERY well for themselves. (Kane himself coming in SECOND place). Not to menon the TV/radio personalities that are gay and it's not big deal.

chad_74
16th April 2011, 12:40 AM
can you compare a big brother contestant to a cooking program contestant?

JarrodJ
16th April 2011, 12:43 AM
I didn't think I did?

You're the one that started talking about gays being treated bad in the media. I simply brought up many examples of how they did quite well.

Gloomis666
16th April 2011, 07:03 AM
I think the best competition for this show should be that they have to make a peice of "Ghost shark" taste good, I bought some at woolies yesterday and cooked it up.
Most disgusting thing I have eaten (well attempted to eat) yet..
no wonder flathead is $40.00 a kilo.

ernesto_1
16th April 2011, 09:33 AM
how exotic

Gloomis666
16th April 2011, 10:49 AM
woolies have such a disgusting selection of fish up here.

the only thing really tasty is salmon @ $33.00 a kg I hardly buy it.
The rest is dodge.

The fish markets are the best but even they are crap, due to global warming ect ..

chad_74
18th April 2011, 07:51 PM
fish markets are crap because we export our good stuff then import the crap from dodgy countries with lacking health regulations...

ernesto_1
18th April 2011, 07:55 PM
how come fish is so expenisve now? i dun cook so i wouldnt know..

Gloomis666
18th April 2011, 09:18 PM
overfishing is the main reason.
not so many fish as there used to be.

ernesto_1
18th April 2011, 09:42 PM
lets all eat horse

Gloomis666
18th April 2011, 11:26 PM
hmm.. too big

ernesto_1
18th April 2011, 11:55 PM
the days of eating real food may be over. we all all be dispensing gunk from a slushie machine and dressed in potato sacks soon

Gloomis666
19th April 2011, 12:15 AM
I dunno, in Brisbane it seems only white people shop at coles and woolworths, other folk utilise markets and whole foods stores.

Fuck it's 12:15 I have to go to bed, gnite.