Men At Beats BustedUndercover, Outed By Mugshots

www.samesame.com.au
  • 40
  • 1
  • 3277

Last week Oklahoma City police arrested 16 men, ranging in age from 20 to 61, as part of a four-day undercover operation at a gay beat at Lake Hefner public park. The men’s mugshots and full names were then published online by The Oklahoman, one of the state’s major news outlets.

“What police can do is try to maintain an atmosphere that will deter this kind of activity,” police Sgt. Jennifer Wardlow told The Oklahoman. “We are pro-active in our approach in trying to eliminate this. We want [families] to be able to go there … and not have to worry about this kind of activity. We are pleased to be able to take these individuals off the streets.”

Master Sgt. Gary Knight defended the undercover action, saying that sending uniformed officers to patrol the park deters activity while the officer is present, but it doesn’t solve the problem.

“When we go in an undercover capacity, we are much more likely to identify who is engaging in lewd acts, and we can make an arrest,” said Knight said.

One can assume that the men who were arrested either don’t identify as gay, or are closeted for any number of reasons. Therefore, one can only imagine the damage caused by publishing their mugshots. So far, The Oklahoman has declined to comment.

According to CNN, publishing mugshots online is becoming more popular in the US. John Watson, associate professor of journalism at American University in Washington, told them that mug shots make good newspaper fodder for three reasons: they are generally cheap or free to obtain, readers enjoy them, and they’re “legally safe” to publish, meaning you can’t be sued for printing what is essentially a government document.

Social

  • rain

Comments

www.samesame.com.au arrow left
8826
Asherbella

Asherbella said on the 28th Apr, 2009

i know this. and what you've quoted me in saying is that from an objective point of view, people don't like beats. the same way they dont like sharps vending machines being near schools, methodone clinics near anywhere, hookers ODing under your front steps. From an objective point of view, I was just saying that the MAGORITY of society don't like these things. So a police task force is appointed to get rid of them (or try). So, my point being, if your a pig, and if you're getting paid to get rid of them, and you have to do a good job for fear or disciplinary action affecting your pay that you need to live, how would you combat the issue. Simple. Out the blokes that use them. I'm not saying i agree, i'm not saying its right, i'm saying its EFFECTIVE.
And I agree, like hookers, beats will just relocate. And if you're in a situation where being outed may cause pain in your life, then DON'T USE BEATS. They are in public. Someone will PROBABLY see. It's common sense. Its a risk evaluation. You run the red you run the risk.
Yes, but the police should be concerned with *law-breakers* that produce VICTIMS. With beat sex there is no victim. Beat sex is not rape. It's adult, consenting, relatively private if the door is locked. Who has ever gone to see a psychiatrist to cope with hearing two blokes jerk off in a toilet together? And think about it. How long do you think the average 'beat meet' lasts for? 2 minutes, tops, I'll bet. Not even that...16 guys were arrested on Oklahoma for about a minute of play. We don't even know what degree of 'play' it was...

naughtylion

naughtylion said on the 28th Apr, 2009

Well, your point is taken; err with caution, be discreet; abstain.
That's logical.
But the sexual impulse to go for immediate, superficial intimacy in the face of feeling repressed, self-loathing, adrift, displaced; that isn't logical; that's another issue totally; an issue that isn't factored into under the law....

I see where you're coming from, but sexual impulse only isn't logical when the person in question lacks the ability to think with their head and not with their dick. That being said though there are countless other channels to achieve (almost) immediate sexual gratification that are legal. Again, I sound like a cold hearted bitch, but I'm stickin to my guns that people need to deal with the consequences of their actions, whether or not these decisions were made in haste or not. There's too much passing of the buck in society with regard to personal responsibility. It's a courtesy and a privilege to have police be sensitive when it comes to publisising your identity. Other criminals don't get the luxury of having their identities completely hidden, so while we're all one under the 'breaking the law' umbrella, why should these guys be treated, or expect to be treated any differently? The police could make the decision to keep identities confidential of sexual deviants as they call me, er, them, but then that wouldn't be effective would it? Sad, depressed, unhappily married fag wants quick man sex on the side, gets caught, fined, and goes out to do it again when his wife and kids have him at breaking point. Thats why beats move on. If the police want to quash this sort of behavior, they have to look at what's effective.I don't expect anything less when it comes to deterring 'real' criminals off a life of crime, so why should I here? Again, I engage in certain behavior that may be considered illegal, but if I make the choice too, I understand and accept the risk. That's all I'm saying with these guys: "what did you expect?"