India's TV gay sex sting

www.samesame.com.au
  • 37
  • 0
  • 15285

An Indian TV news report titled Gay Culture Rampant In Hyderabad has publicly outed several Indian gay men following a covert ‘gay-sting’ operation.

The report from news channel TV9 Telugu shows people searching through gay youths profiles on online dating/social networking website planetromeo.com.

The men found on the website were labeled ‘deviants’ and photos of them, along with personal information such as names, were clearly displayed.

Extremely private information about one user – including his penis size, fetishes, and his preferred sexual position – was shown in the report.

The item continued with phone-call ‘gay-stings’ of two of the website’s users whose profiles and faces were also shown. During the calls an investigator posed as a planetromeo.com user and the men are covertly asked questions about their sexual lives and preferences.

Homosexual activity in India, while legalised in 2009, still remains a cultural taboo within wider Indian society and government.

GAY COMMUNITY OUTRAGE

TV9 has been condemned by Indian Desi blog Gaysi, encouraging others to “voice their opposition to TV9’s blatant act of privacy and rights violation.”

The Gaysi article titled ‘TV9s Homophobic Coverage’ also goes on to list the news report’s broadcast violations of the News Broadcasters Association’s (NBA) Code of Ethics and Broadcasting Standards which, for example, “clearly prohibits superstition (Section 2 Article 8) to be passed off as a fact” citing the generalisation of gay men as ‘deviant’, used in the news report as a reference.

Aditya Bondyopadhyay, advocate and Director of LGBT Human Rights Programs for Delhi based LGBT community organisation Adhikaar, also issued a letter to TV9’s legal department.

His states that the channel “will be held solely responsible for any harm or injury that is caused to any member of the LGBT community of Hyderabad or anywhere else in India,” and also points out that the news report “hunted down private profiles of individuals.” Not only were their names and pictures broadcast but TV9’s crew “called them up in a clear attempt at entrapment and prodded them with leading questions about their private sexual lives.

“As a rule channels must not intrude on private lives or personal affairs of individuals, unless there is a clearly established larger and identifiable public interest for such a broadcast,” added Bondyopadhyay, who seeks an apology “separately and specifically, to each and every individual who has been maliciously and unethically targeted by your channel, as well as to air a news article apologizing to the entire LGBT community of India whose security, constitutionally protected liberties and freedoms, and fundamental rights to a life of dignity, have been severely jeopardized by your unscientific, prejudiced, unsubstantiated, malicious, and vicious content and comments.” The full letter can be read here.

TV9 has yet to comment on the news report, but the video of the original story has now been removed from TV9’s YouTube channel. It has since been uploaded by another YouTube user:

An English transcript of the report is here.

TV ‘gay sting’ tactics were used locally for a 7 News story last year outing NSW MP David Campbell. 7’s report was unfortunately OKed by Australia’s media watchdogs as being “in the public interest.”

Social

Nobody has hearted this, be the first Be the first!

Comments

www.samesame.com.au arrow left
21676
JesseMatheson

JesseMatheson said on the 24th Feb, 2011

But have you heard about this~
http://www.samesame.com.au/forum/showthread.php?t=21605

I stand by my statement. You are trying to say that morals are only relative to the person/society that hold them and so we should not judge.. am I correct?

I agree, to an extent. Other countries and people hold morals that are in conflict with my own, but that does not mean that it validates them having these morals.

Look at Nazi Germany, one could argue that they cannot be blamed for what they did because it was their own beliefs, moral relativism would state that I am in no position to oppose their beliefs, but in reality their beliefs were built upon fundamentally false science and so they are wrong.

As for this article (case in point), there are many reasons for why this news station is in the wrong, even if it is in India and their society has different social values/morals to our own.

1) The report breaches several Indian ethical codes of conduct for Broadcasting, including the TV stations own ethical beliefs to not target minorities.

2) It is legal to be gay in India! If FOX News did this there would be a similar uproar, sure there are people who are against homosexuality in America but that doesn't give them a right to discriminate or practically destroy peoples lives.

Finally, Beaus' view is wrong because he believes we should all cast a blind eye when the past has shown us that reacting to these situations, in forms of media or direct action towards the offending outlet, does in fact create a positive change.

We are not championing TV9, we are not condoning its actions and we are not attacking their society, but we are criticising a reputable media outlet for its lack of responsible broadcasting and total lack of human rights.

*breathes*