Cover Charges Set To Climb

Think you’re paying enough to go clubbing already? Well get ready to pay more with the news that industry body Phonographic Performance Company of Australia (PPCA) has won its legal fight to raise music licensing fees for recorded music, meaning that both nightclubs and dance music will have to pay more per punter for every night or event where recorded music is played. This will surely pass onto higher club entry and ticket prices; but is it a loss for clubbers or a win for producers?

Following a ruling by the Copyright Tribunal of Australia yesterday, the fees paid by venues that play recorded music will rise from its former flat rate of seven cents per patron per song, to a rate that can go as high as $3.07 per person depending on the scale of the event. Breaking it down, clubs will now pay a licence fee of $1.05 a person based on the club’s capacity, which means that a club that holds 1000 people for instance will pay $1100, even if the venue is only half filled for the evening.

The rate paid by dance party organisers will now rise from 20 cents to $3.07 cents per person, with a ‘dance party’ defined as a one off or occasional event and not held regularly at a nightclub’s premises. The Tribunal claimed that in its decision that it had found a rate of reparation for artists that delivers the fair market price for the privilege of playing the recorded music.

“If it be the fact that the market rate is 30 times the rate that has hitherto been charged… that is no reason why it should not now charge that rate.”

Marcus Bourget, Chair of Mardi Gras, was disappointed to hear about the decision. “We’re a not for profit organisation, but unfortunately we won’t be able to get an exemption for this. It means that for a 10,000 person party, it’s an extra $30,000 that we’ll have to cover”.

For organisations like Mardi Gras, it means even more of a balancing act. Mardi Gras already struggles to remain competitively priced, given that they have a parade that they have to pay for.

“It means juggling to keep ticket prices competitive but also provide the production values that people want,” says Marcus. “We don’t get opportunities like other promoters to make that revenue back. For instance, our coat check is run by a charity, so we don’t get any of that money.”


Comments

Hey there, you need to be logged in to get involved with SameSame, click here to login if you're already a member, or here if you need to become a new member.

www.samesame.com.au

doodle_chaser

said ages ago
Boo Hiss
www.samesame.com.au

gwallop

said ages ago
No Tax for Gays!
www.samesame.com.au

kylierose

said ages ago
this spells some bad news to me. but let's just wait and see
what happens first. it's a big slug for promoters, no doubts
about that...
www.samesame.com.au

danny corvini

said ages ago
Is the money only paid to Aussie artists, or do they distribute
it internationally?
www.samesame.com.au

david_margeaux

said ages ago
half goes to the artist, half to the record companies.
www.samesame.com.au

taylor-dayne

said ages ago
is this a way of making up revenue that's been lost to illegal
downloading? or am i just drawing long bows here?
www.samesame.com.au

ap_bcd

said ages ago
I wonder if this is part of bringing our copyright laws in line
with the US as part of the free trade agreement, something I
always suspected would be nasty in lots of ways
www.samesame.com.au

hazyinseptember

said ages ago
im sure its has something to do with with illegal downloads..
but just really how much do artists see of this money?
www.samesame.com.au

Tim D

said ages ago
No industry can rightly justify a 1500% increase, let alone the
nightclub industry.
www.samesame.com.au

gwallop

said ages ago
Toybox Party and all gay parties should be exempt from the new
tax!
www.samesame.com.au

Christian Taylor

said ages ago
why toybox? just out of curiosity...
www.samesame.com.au

kylierose

said ages ago
because everyone knows, every gay likes trance. i agree, no tax
on trance for gays... would you vote for me?
www.samesame.com.au

kylierose

said ages ago
this decision seems more about gouging out the clubs and party
scenes than it does about supporting musicians and producers
(whether they are derived of royalties from pirate mp3
networks, or otherwise). it's worth petitioning against, that's
for sure
www.samesame.com.au

gwallop

said ages ago
'Christian' I just singled out Toybox because its such an
awesome party and yes what 'Kylie Rose' said ''No Tax for
Trance!''
www.samesame.com.au

About The Author

www.samesame.com.au

angy

angy joined us ages ago.

I Heart

Nobody has hearted this article