Cover Charges Set To Climb

www.samesame.com.au
  • 14
  • 0
  • 2591

Think you’re paying enough to go clubbing already? Well get ready to pay more with the news that industry body Phonographic Performance Company of Australia (PPCA) has won its legal fight to raise music licensing fees for recorded music, meaning that both nightclubs and dance music will have to pay more per punter for every night or event where recorded music is played. This will surely pass onto higher club entry and ticket prices; but is it a loss for clubbers or a win for producers?

Following a ruling by the Copyright Tribunal of Australia yesterday, the fees paid by venues that play recorded music will rise from its former flat rate of seven cents per patron per song, to a rate that can go as high as $3.07 per person depending on the scale of the event. Breaking it down, clubs will now pay a licence fee of $1.05 a person based on the club’s capacity, which means that a club that holds 1000 people for instance will pay $1100, even if the venue is only half filled for the evening.

The rate paid by dance party organisers will now rise from 20 cents to $3.07 cents per person, with a ‘dance party’ defined as a one off or occasional event and not held regularly at a nightclub’s premises. The Tribunal claimed that in its decision that it had found a rate of reparation for artists that delivers the fair market price for the privilege of playing the recorded music.

“If it be the fact that the market rate is 30 times the rate that has hitherto been charged… that is no reason why it should not now charge that rate.”

Marcus Bourget, Chair of Mardi Gras, was disappointed to hear about the decision. “We’re a not for profit organisation, but unfortunately we won’t be able to get an exemption for this. It means that for a 10,000 person party, it’s an extra $30,000 that we’ll have to cover”.

For organisations like Mardi Gras, it means even more of a balancing act. Mardi Gras already struggles to remain competitively priced, given that they have a parade that they have to pay for.

“It means juggling to keep ticket prices competitive but also provide the production values that people want,” says Marcus. “We don’t get opportunities like other promoters to make that revenue back. For instance, our coat check is run by a charity, so we don’t get any of that money.”

Social

Nobody has hearted this, be the first Be the first!

Comments

www.samesame.com.au arrow left
Comment Added
kylierose

kylierose said on the 11th Jul, 2007

this spells some bad news to me. but let's just wait and see what happens first. it's a big slug for promoters, no doubts about that...

danny corvini

danny corvini said on the 11th Jul, 2007

Is the money only paid to Aussie artists, or do they distribute it internationally?

david_margeaux

david_margeaux said on the 11th Jul, 2007

half goes to the artist, half to the record companies.

taylor-dayne

taylor-dayne said on the 11th Jul, 2007

is this a way of making up revenue that's been lost to illegal downloading? or am i just drawing long bows here?

ap_bcd

ap_bcd said on the 11th Jul, 2007

I wonder if this is part of bringing our copyright laws in line with the US as part of the free trade agreement, something I always suspected would be nasty in lots of ways

hazyinseptember

hazyinseptember said on the 11th Jul, 2007

im sure its has something to do with with illegal downloads.. but just really how much do artists see of this money?

Tim D

Tim D said on the 11th Jul, 2007

No industry can rightly justify a 1500% increase, let alone the nightclub industry.

gwallop

gwallop said on the 12th Jul, 2007

Toybox Party and all gay parties should be exempt from the new tax!

Christian Taylor

Christian Taylor said on the 12th Jul, 2007

why toybox? just out of curiosity...

kylierose

kylierose said on the 13th Jul, 2007

because everyone knows, every gay likes trance. i agree, no tax on trance for gays... would you vote for me?

kylierose

kylierose said on the 13th Jul, 2007

this decision seems more about gouging out the clubs and party scenes than it does about supporting musicians and producers (whether they are derived of royalties from pirate mp3 networks, or otherwise). it's worth petitioning against, that's for sure

gwallop

gwallop said on the 20th Jul, 2007

'Christian' I just singled out Toybox because its such an awesome party and yes what 'Kylie Rose' said ''No Tax for Trance!''