John Howard: HIV Not Welcomein Australia

www.samesame.com.au
  • 25
  • 0
  • 6176

Prime Minister John Howard today said that he believes HIV positive people should not be allowed to immigrate to Australia.

Speaking to the Southern Cross radio network, Howard said, “My initial reaction is no [they should not be allowed in]. There may be some humanitarian considerations that could temper that in certain cases but prima facie – no.” He then went on to say he would like “more counsel” on the issue.

HIV legal campaigners have this afternoon said that Howard should be investigated for discriminating against people with the virus.

Howard was commenting in response to new Victorian health department figures that showed the number of HIV positive people moving to the state had quadrupled in the past two years.

Current Australian immigration rules require permanent residents to have a HIV test, but a positive result does not mean that a person’s visa would be denied. Howard said today that he will look at changing that. “I think we should have the most stringent possible conditions in relation to that nationwide.”

It’s the latest in a series of regressive moves from the most conservative Prime Minister that Australia has ever had. Don’t forget, this is the same man who has single handedly vetoed any move by progressive Australia States to recognise same-sex unions, despite the global shift being made to legalising gay marriages.

God speed the next elections.

Social

Nobody has hearted this, be the first Be the first!

Comments

www.samesame.com.au arrow left
Comment Added
hazyinseptember

hazyinseptember said on the 13th Apr, 2007

this is not something new, i know of people being not allowed into america because of their hiv status. i think we should reject more dumbass, redneck, politicians..

jasn_REMOVED

jasn_REMOVED said on the 13th Apr, 2007

And everyone who automatically opposes John Howard on this issue have bought the latest Big Issue. Or, at least, offered a homeless person a home. It's a similar concept to accepting HIV people. Diluting your resources to help yourself to help others.

Christian Taylor

Christian Taylor said on the 13th Apr, 2007

my god john howard is so TEDIOUS! can someone please just press DELETE?

jackie87

jackie87 said on the 13th Apr, 2007

I'm not surprised that he will continue to jump on the populist bandwagon and discriminate but its about time Australia voted with their feet and got rid of this disgusting cretin.

meezon04

meezon04 said on the 14th Apr, 2007

not sure how to react to this one - part of me agrees with him, but yeh discrimination - guess he can't win em all...

rheiner

rheiner said on the 14th Apr, 2007

Things to do today: 1. Re-read article with 'breast cancer' in place of HIV2. Imagine public outcry at such a suggestion3. Enjoy deafening silence4. Reflect on joy of living in Australia in 2007.

amband

amband said on the 14th Apr, 2007

As much as I can't stand his politics, Mr Howard is correct here. Politicians are already constitutionally obliged to prevent disease coming into the country. Pity they didn't read the bloody constitution.

The Gay Curmudgeon

The Gay Curmudgeon said on the 15th Apr, 2007

Hey Amband, can you explain where in the Constitution politicians are obliged to "prevent disease coming into the country"? My reading doesn't show any such obligation. Are you confusing powers (1.V.51.ix & xxvii) with obligations?

kylierose

kylierose said on the 15th Apr, 2007

i'm shocked at these comments, but not really that surprised. the trouble is that there are contingencies within the population who would agree with him and that's why he feels comfortable presenting these views. may well we say.....

Giorni

Giorni said on the 16th Apr, 2007

Rheiner, I totally agree with your analogy. Bring on the next election, please!

Tristianity

Tristianity said on the 16th Apr, 2007

Am i the only right winged fag on here? I'd rather Howard then Rudd any day.

Brunhilde

Brunhilde said on the 16th Apr, 2007

Howard is only doing what is in Australia's national interest. There has been a 45% rise in HIV infections in Australia in 5 years. That statistic is terrifying. We need to do all that we can to reduce further infections in this country.

danny corvini

danny corvini said on the 16th Apr, 2007

Be prepared for Howard to attempt to use this disease as this year's year's grubby wedge issue.

jasn_REMOVED

jasn_REMOVED said on the 16th Apr, 2007

Elderly British immigrants aren't allowed in unless they fork over massive amounts of money, even when they retain their UK pension. Is this discrimination? Or protection of our already buckling aged care and health system.

danny corvini

danny corvini said on the 16th Apr, 2007

I think it is good policy - I just don't like the way Howard is using it.

Giorni

Giorni said on the 16th Apr, 2007

Tristianity, the moment that any of the right wing parties actually DO something positive for the gay community, instead of talk about it and then do the opposite, I might, only might, consider voting for them. But I'm not holding my breath!

imthinking

imthinking said on the 16th Apr, 2007

The law already excludes most people with HIV migrating to Oz. No business or points based migration is possible if you are HIV. If you are a refugee or family of an Australian you may, exceptionally, get a health waiver. It's hardly easy already!

danny corvini

danny corvini said on the 17th Apr, 2007

I just hope that the Australian media is wise enough after all of these years to see how Howard manipulates people's fears to his advantage, even if the 'risk' is hardly there (ie baby overboard drama)

shaynesydney

shaynesydney said on the 18th Apr, 2007

Of course Hiv people, foreigners, and especially homosexual men are devious and cannot be trusted to act responsibly. I see a new Tampa on the horizon, and it's name is "HIV'. What a vote winning mix of xenophobia and homophobia.

cazz

cazz said on the 18th Apr, 2007

I agree with john Howard on this! i do not usually agree with his policies.

danny corvini

danny corvini said on the 18th Apr, 2007

Yes, and tie in the myth that those people bringing HIV in are African refugees, and you have Howard Gold..

shaynesydney

shaynesydney said on the 18th Apr, 2007

even worse, danny....'men of middle eastern appearance! (shudder).

danny corvini

danny corvini said on the 19th Apr, 2007

Fortunately for them, they have managed to escape the virus's clutch to the extent of the poor African continent....

shaynesydney

shaynesydney said on the 22nd Apr, 2007

well, that's an interesting point, danni. In my experience, MSM was pretty common in Muslim countries bocs sexual contact with wimmin b4 marriage is verboten. So how come their low HIV rates?

shaynesydney

shaynesydney said on the 22nd Apr, 2007

ooops, I mean Danny, not danni...gawds, I am SUUUUCH a queen!