Watchdogs OK Libra's ladies

www.samesame.com.au
  • 29
  • 2
  • 529

An Aussie-made Libra tampon ad blasted as transphobic when it first appeared on screens in New Zealand has been given the go ahead from our local advertising complaints agency.

The ad ( see it here ) showed two women audaciously competing with each other in a nightclub bathroom. One of them shows she uses Libra tampons, and threfore appears to win their battle.

While many thought the lame ad was no big deal, transgender groups – and several readers here on Same Same – spoke up calling the commercial “damaging and demeaning” to transpeople.

The Australian Advertising Standards Bureau has now ruled that the ad “does not demean women who do not menstruate, nor does it demean or vilify transgender people and does not vilify men who dress as woman.”

The ad “features a man dressed as a woman in a female bathroom environment, however there is no way of determining whether they are representative of drag queens or transgender women,” says the ruling.

It concluded: “the advertisement did not discriminate against or vilify any section of the community.”

When the debate raged earlier this month, the ad’s Melbourne drag queen star Sandee Crack said she was proud of it. “Libra were both sensitive, professional and accepting of my needs as a drag queen and as a gay man throughout the production process,” the drag entertainer said. “I never felt for one moment that I would be depicted as a trans woman, nor do I believe that I have been.”

But several prominent transgender community voices are still annoyed, and have now blasted the Advertising Standards Bureau’s decision. 9 News spoke to Transgender Victoria spokesperson Sally Goldner, who found the ad ‘disturbing’.

“A big issue we face is violence in toilets because we don’t meet people’s expectations,” she says, “and (the Advertising Standards Bureau) are effectively spitting in the face of people trying to stop violence against transgender people.

“We think the ad standards gang are very ineffective and they have never understood transgender issues.”

Though the Ad Standards Bureau’s decision means the Libra ladies have been given the OK for screens across Australia, it’s unlikely to be seen. The tampon company was quick to respond to criticism of the commercial, saying: “Libra regrets any offence taken to our recent tampon advertisement. It was never intended to upset or offend anyone.

“Libra takes all feedback very seriously, and in response to this, we will immediately review our future position with this campaign based on the feedback received.”

Social

  • CarlosaurusRex
  • Lazzarus

Comments

www.samesame.com.au arrow left
26647
JayTee

JayTee said on the 1st Feb, 2012



It's called rejection sensitivity. I've been reading about it in my studies.

According to attachment theory, if your parents reject you as a child/adolescent or try to modify essential parts of your self expression (particularly by using shame), then you are more likely to feel anxious, and thus see threats everywhere instead of opportunity. Psychologists theorize that it's a way of protecting oneself from the hurt of rejection - people either attack, or retreat. Thus you have the people on here attacking almost everyone and every comment, (even grammar!) or huffing and puffing and making a big show of leaving here.

As the glbt has a history of rejection from family and parents - especially during the sensitive adolescent years, there is quite abit anxiety and rejection sensivity about.

The studies I've read mainly link gender non-conformity as one of the biggest aspects of parental shaming of their children, and as it's much more acceptable for girls to be a tomboys (to a certain degree) than it is for boys to be effeminate, gay men are at higher risk of anxiety as adults. Thankfully the studies suggest that as gay people age their levels of anxiety fall to levels close to that of heterosexuals.

The studies I've read focused on gay men and lesbians, but I imagine the gender non-conforming aspects are even higher for trans children.

Also caucasian parents (in the studies i've read anyway) are less likely to use shame as a way to coerce their children's behaviour, thus their children are less anxious as adults. it's quite fascinating research.

MrAsh

MrAsh said on the 1st Feb, 2012

It's called rejection sensitivity. I've been reading about it in my studies.

According to attachment theory, if your parents reject you as a child/adolescent or try to modify essential parts of your self expression (particularly by using shame), then you are more likely to feel anxious, and thus see threats everywhere instead of opportunity. Psychologists theorize that it's a way of protecting oneself from the hurt of rejection - people either attack, or retreat. Thus you have the people on here attacking almost everyone and every comment, (even grammar!) or huffing and puffing and making a big show of leaving here.

As the glbt has a history of rejection from family and parents - especially during the sensitive adolescent years, there is quite abit anxiety and rejection sensivity about.

The studies I've read mainly link gender non-conformity as one of the biggest aspects of parental shaming of their children, and as it's much more acceptable for girls to be a tomboys (to a certain degree) than it is for boys to be effeminate, gay men are at higher risk of anxiety as adults. Thankfully the studies suggest that as gay people age their levels of anxiety fall to levels close to that of heterosexuals.

The studies I've read focused on gay men and lesbians, but I imagine the gender non-conforming aspects are even higher for trans children.

Also caucasian parents (in the studies i've read anyway) are less likely to use shame as a way to coerce their children's behaviour, thus their children are less anxious as adults. it's quite fascinating research.

That is fascinating and I've learned something about myself from that. Thank you Jay Tee. I can see why a lot of guys behave badly in saunas, it's the rejection aspect.

datkindagal

datkindagal said on the 1st Feb, 2012

Complaints that latest Libra ad will incite transgender prejudice ignored by Australia’s Advertising Bureau as debate gains fuel (once again).

SCALLYWAG JANUARY 31, 2012 0


It seems the debate behind Libra‘s ad for its tampon pitting one ‘natural’ woman against a ‘transgender’ woman has riled its head once again pursuant to local demands that Australia’s Advertising Standards Bureau pull the ad or risk inciting prejudice against the transgender community, who yesterday intimated that they will for the time being allow the ad to continue running.

The ad which depicts two women competitively adjusting themselves in the bathroom takes great strain to make sure that viewers understand who the real woman is (that is, she’s the one who menstruates thank you very much, and whom their product is ‘naturally’ intended for) as opposed to the transgender woman who is subtly derided and as many have argued by implication connoted not to be a legitimate woman. A connotation which has infuriated the transgender community in Australia who have to date been unable to have Australia’s Advertising Standards Bureau recant and take the ad out of circulation. This despite New Zealand’s Advertising Standards Bureau agreeing to take the ad down earlier last month when it first appeared.

Despite what many in the transgender community recognize is the gentle poking fun that the ad presumes to make its underlying message nevertheless served in effect to reinforce negative stereotypes and attitudes towards the community who are fighting hard to distance themselves from an over riding culture that seeks to portray them as anything but legitimate.

Given Australia’s inclination (despite the governments pubic stance otherwise) to manifest highly contentious stereotypes (if one needs a guide one only observe Australia’s history with respect to its indigenous people and that of immigrants since the 1960′s who had to endure continuing dissent and prejudice in the community- as this author is able to personally attest to) one could possibly posit that in fact the transgenders concerns about vilified perceptions and treatment as a consequence of are hardly unfounded.

This can unfortunately be evidenced by the rise of indiscriminate gay bashings, work prejudice and an ongoing counter intuitive attitude towards those persons who do not often or immediately display what many Australians have come to understand what makes one whole or worthy of enlightened consideration. A persistent problem ever since the inception of the country despite the continual progress the government has been able to make in affecting attitudes otherwise.



In choosing to keep the ad, Australia’s Advertising Standards board held the following view:

“The ad does not demean women who do not menstruate, nor does it demean or vilify transgender people and does not vilify men who dress as woman.”

The Board however did admit that there was “no way of determining” whether the drag queen character was “representative of drag queens or transgender women.”

Offered Warren Talbot, a LGBTI Health Alliance executive:

“It wasn’t clear to me and I’m sure to the average member of the general public it would not be clear. In fact, the community at large may not be fully aware of the distinction. It is this very ambiguity which provides the potential of harm to trans women, who already battle the widespread misperception that they are ‘men’ posing as women,”

“They deserve our compassion and support, not the kind of ridicule this ad portrays.”

Yet what perhaps makes the Advertising Standards Bureau stance somewhat perverse is the stance it adopted last year. As reiterated by Fiona Jolly, the Bureau’s CEO:

“The diversity of the board brings with it an understanding of the many different community standards which relate to decisions that need to be made by the board,”

It’s perhaps interesting to note that not one of the boards 20 members has been able to demonstrate a nuanced understanding or background in LGBTI affairs.

Which poses the question is this is a situation of the transgender community being too vigilant in asserting their individual rights and a greater sensitivity to contentious or perhaps as many would wonder behind closed doors, a continuation of the parochial and often discriminatory practices of a nation too inured to the great discomfort often felt by those on the receiving end of hard to get over experiences courtesy of those who have historically had a time letting go of stark dispositions of cultural identities and individuals?

gaynewsnetwork.com.au