Marriage equality 'inevitable'– Gillard

www.samesame.com.au
  • 17
  • 9
  • 2199

Our picture shows Prime Minister Julia Gillard meeting last night with three same-sex couples, who chatted to her about marriage equality – and she made an extraordinary admission.

Since she swept into power, the PM had been a staunch opponent of changing the Marriage Act, even going against almost all her party’s state leaders – and national polls which put support for marriage equality at around 62% – on the issue.

But last night over dinner at the Lodge, Australian Marriage Equality advocate Alex Greenwich says Gillard was a receptive audience.

“The Prime Minister listened carefully to the case for equality, and gave us all hope when she said the reform would happen one day,” Greenwich reports back.

Among the dining couples were John and Steve from Gillard’s own electorate. “We shared with the Prime Minister that this reform was widely supported within her own electorate of Lalor,” they say.

NSW couple Sandy and Lou also chatted to Julia, and had brought along their two young boys. “The Prime Minister made the point that the more countries that embrace this reform, the clearer it becomes that this is a reform whose time has come,” they reveal.

Brisbane pair Sharon and Elaine were also confidant that Gillard was making progress. “Although she said she opposed marriage equality, we were given hope that her opposition was not immovable,” they explain.

Everyone at the dinner, including the PM, agreed the opposition should allow a free vote. Tony Abbott also opposes marriage equality, but since some of his opposition MPs support the cause, allowing a conscience vote means a Marriage Equality Bill has a chance of moving through into law.

Social

  • AvZ1987
  • Brightbear
  • rockstarclayton
  • Robinzz3
  • jamestohl
  • vanessawaldorf
  • adamlove
  • Lazzarus
  • MrAsh

Comments

www.samesame.com.au arrow left
26946
Marc

Marc said on the 22nd Feb, 2012

What shits me about her statement that marriage equality is inevitable, is do we as the voting population follow the lead of a polly, OR as our Westminster political system dictates, the pollies debate and vote in parliament according to the wishes of their constituents?

If there is an overwhelming degree of public sentiment, support, and wish for equality, then 'inevitable' shouldn't even be in her vocabulary. It should already have been decided in parliament and dealt with.

Julia Gillard is unarguably the worst prime minister we have had to endure in our history. Her inconsistent life style with her political views, everyone knows - defacoto relationship - enjoys ALL the civil rights a married couple have, she has no religious affiliations so can't use the "it's not Christian" argument with any conviction even when that argument is full of shit.
Either Julia does the right thing and leads her party and our country according to the wishes of her constituents, which quite frankly would make her extremely popular, or she fucks off.

I am not an out, loud and proud supporter of "marriage equality". I hate the terminology. I hate the notion that the Christian fundamentalist right wing believe they own the institution of marriage and carry on a public debate about it, when it is rightfully a civil law matter. I hate the fact that the gay community are subscribing to the "marriage" institution as society so romantically view it, when more than 50% of marriages fail and end in financial grief, and god help the IVF conceived and/or adopted children of gay families!
The straight community have well and truly fucked up the married 2.4 kids, golden retriever, house in a Delfin Estate, Ford Territory and Mazda MX5 up the drive dream with a half million dollar mortgage, and they have done so for the past 40 +years. I don't buy it either!

What I do want, is parliament to attribute to any 'declared' relationship the same laws that are implied once any couple marry, and just get on with it instead of shoving media bites and platitudes about inevitability!