ACL urges boycott of 7'sSunrise

www.samesame.com.au
  • 13
  • 0
  • 1938

The Australian Christian Lobby is incensed at 7’s Sunrise breakfast show for backing marriage equality along with Marie Claire magazine, so they’re urging their supporters to boycott the show and reject its advertisers.

The ACL and its leader Jim Wallace have previously been invited to take part in lively debates about marriage equality on Sunrise – see here and here – so they may be surprised that the show has suddenly given its full support to the cause, announced with a flurry of celebrity endorsements via Marie Claire magazine at the weekend.

“That a TV current affairs show, let alone TV station, should take sides in such a highly contentious issue in the public square is disgraceful,” says an ACL statement. “What it says for the respect they have for alternative opinion, even our values, is extremely disappointing and we need to register our disappointment.”

ACL supporters are invited to contact Sunrise via its website and make comments. “Ask them what you are supposed to think this action means for their respect and even tolerance of your views and values on an issue that goes to the very heart of family and the flourishing of children,” the lobby group advises.

“Register your disgust that the press, supposedly the neutral umpire and facilitator of public debate, should allow itself to be captured by the propaganda machine of the gay lobby.”

You can even: “If you’re so convicted, you might advise them that you do not propose to watch the show again.”

Views from the flock

On the ACL’s website there are even links to several of Sunrise’s advertisers which people can use to contact them and protest too.

Moderated by the ACL’s staff, there are extraordinary comments below the statement, too. “As a former member of the LGBTIQ community, I do not support same-sex marriage because I care for those who it affects,” notes one commenter, who says she won’t watch Sunrise again or support its advertisers. “I believe it is unacceptable that the press, supposedly the neutral umpire and facilitator of public debate, should allow itself to be captured by the propaganda machine of the gay lobby; especially when considering only 4-10% of people actually identify as homosexual.”

Another commenter added: “Why are you pandering to 4% of the population, and why should we rewrite what marriage means to satisfy the whinging of that 4%?”

“Your reasoning leads to people marrying their fridges or dog,” chimed in another.

Jobs are at stake as emotions run high: “I work for Accor [listed as one of Sunrise’s advertisers], and will be resigning my post in the morning in protest over this.”

But not all the comments were in favour of boycotting Sunrise and its sponsors. “Thanks,” typed Michael, “I used your links to tell these organisations that I think their stance is appropriate. Same sex marriage is right and inevitable.”

Several coarser communications from marriage equality supporters appear to have been deleted though. “ADVICE FROM ACL MODERATOR TO ‘GAY BOY’, ‘LLOYD’, ‘ADRIAN PRUST’, ‘FAG’, ‘TIMOTHY STEVENS’, ‘CHRIS CARRICK-HAYES’, ‘CRITICIZE-O-BOT’ AND OTHERS,” shouted a site admin. “Abusing Christians and /or ACL with four-letter-words does nothing to enhance your arguments. Arguments ostensibly about ‘equal love’.”

Social

Nobody has hearted this, be the first Be the first!

Comments

www.samesame.com.au arrow left
27996
Spike-X

Spike-X said on the 5th Jun, 2012

I posted this comment at the ACL's website, but in case they choose not to publish it, I'll post it here, too:

%u201CThat a TV current affairs show, let alone TV station, should take sides in such a highly contentious issue in the public square is disgraceful. What it says for the respect they have for alternative opinion, even our values, is extremely disappointing and we need to register our disappointment.%u201D

Yes, and I%u2019m sure you%u2019d be just as disappointed if they%u2019d decided to take your side against full marriage equality for all consenting adult couples, wouldn%u2019t you? Would you be disgusted if the press, supposedly the neutral umpire and facilitator of public debate, were to allow itself to be captured by the propaganda machine of the anti-equality lobby? Or would you proclaim to the heavens and all who would listen about what a valuable ally you had in your fight against common human decency?

If you find that your opinion %u2013 that some Australians don%u2019t deserve full equality under the law %u2013 is not being respected, maybe it%u2019s time to reconsider that opinion, and evaluate whether it is indeed worthy of respect?

Like all Australians, you have the right to express your views. What you do not have is the right to not have those views disagreed with in any way. And you%u2019d better start getting used to being disagreed with, because you%u2019re plainly in the wrong, as were the people who fought against full equality for indigenous Australians, or the right of women to vote, or the right of any other section of the community to be treated as fully equal under the law.