Fore or against the foreskin?

www.samesame.com.au
  • 50
  • 1
  • 3048

Diving into online dating sites, sooner or later you’ll be asked “top or bottom?”, followed up by “cut or uncut?”. And when it comes to the foreskin – or lack of it – it isn’t just gay men who have strong opinions.

In a passionate TV debate to be screened on Tuesday, SBS’s Insight program has discovered that three things come to the fore with male circumcision – medical, religious and aesthetic reasons.

There’s a fierce argument in Australian medical circles about whether routine circumcision could significantly reduce the risk of illnesses and infections. Far fewer boys are circumcised now than a generation ago.

Male circumcision still plays a religious role in Australia’s Jewish and Muslim communities and is a traditional cultural practice for some people from Indigenous, African, Middle Eastern and Islander backgrounds. And for some, it’s just the way it’s always been done.

“It’s a tradition we’ve had all along, throughout our history,” Kevin Rogers, who lives in a remote Indigenous community in the Northern Territory, explains. “It prepares them for manhood or young manhood, you know?”

If you decide you want a circumcision for your child, there are hurdles: in some parts of Australia it’s virtually impossible to find doctors who will perform the procedure. And no one seems to be able to agree on what’s the best age.

Pip Fleming has yet to decide whether to circumcise her son and is struggling to make a decision. “As a mother you want to protect your child from that pain. But it’s what my family’s always done. Is that justification for doing something that may hurt a child? So we’re undecided.”

Medical practitioners also have differing opinions. Dr Stan Wisniewski, who runs a practice at Nedlands in Western Australia, questions the cultural angle. “Why is it the way it is? We are all born with foreskins. What have we done in our civilisation to demean the foreskin?”

For some, circumcision is their own personal choice. As Karl Williams explained to Insight’s Jenny Brockie, “I think it’s better, it looks better aesthetically. For a period I wore my foreskin back and that was a part of me figuring out if I would lose sensitivity from it, which didn’t happen so then I decided when I was 18 to go ahead with it. And I’m very happy.”

But some men who’ve had the cut mourn the loss of their foreskin, including Elwyn Moir. He’s started treatment to stretch the skin on his penis to try and re-establish a foreskin.

“I had a choice made for me that there’s not much I can do to undo. When I realised what was missing, when I saw an intact penis, then I was quite shocked. I would very much like to have been able to reach maturity and decide what to do with my own sexual anatomy.”

You can watch the full discussion on Insight’s documentary The First Cut, this Tuesday 2 October at 8.30pm on SBS 1.

Social

  • MrAsh

Comments

www.samesame.com.au arrow left
29126
AusyAndy

AusyAndy said on the 2nd Oct, 2012

FORE! I personally find a cut penis far less attractive, and there are simply no reasons to remove the foreskin.

In this day and age there's no reason at all to remove the (NOT useless, like people love to say) piece of skin - an important part of the body for sexual stimulation and an extremely sensitive area of the penis, and even protecting the head of the penis. It's just ridiculous and really pisses me off to be honest. The removal of a healthy and even important part of the human body IS mutilation, and no matter how you try to spin it, it's butchery. And I find it disgusting that it's done to babies and children that have no choice in the matter, based on religion or complete paranoid bullshit from an ancient time without medicine about it being better or healthier for them in the future to be without it. Quite frankly, I think it shouldn't be happening at all unless an adult makes the decision that he wants his foreskin cut off for whatever personal reason he can come up with to justify snipping off a perfectly good piece of skin full of sensitive nerve endings. (And I really doubt you'd find many men that would want theirs removed based on preference if they had the choice to begin with.)

It makes me quite sad that some people go through life never knowing just what it's actually like to have a foreskin, how sensitive it really is and how great it can feel. And those that will even argue in favour of circumcision based on their own lack of experience with having a foreskin. I've seen so many guys state that they prefer other cut guys, simply because they themselves have been circumcised through no choice of their own so they've convinced themselves they prefer it in other men too. As far as preferences go, there are biased opinions on both sides of any subject, but it only seems to be the cut guys that are so strongly for it (and they are the only ones I've ever seen make the ignorant claim that it's a "useless piece of skin"), because they have to be happy with what's been done to them or they'll be forced to be unhappy with their own penis.

I must say I am quite disturbed when I hear (in arguments/discussions about circumcision), more often than I can believe, that a parent (almost always the mother) has her son circumcised because SHE thinks it's more attractive. That's just so very disturbing... But if a mother wants any say in her child's circumcision, it should be that of her daughter not the son and his body parts that she has no idea what it's like to live with.

:mad: Yes, I hate circumcision.